差异化战略下现金股利政策研究

摘要选取2007—2018年中国A股上市公司财务数据,从融资约束的视角出发,研究企业战略差异对现金股利政策的影响,并基于制度背景研究了产权性质和市场化水平的调节效应。实证结果表明:企业战略差异会降低现金股利支付倾向和现金股利支付水平,国有产权性质和较高的市场化水平均削弱了企业战略差异对现金股利政策的负向影响。战略差异通过加剧企业融资约束程度,降低了现金股利支付倾向和支付水平。从理论上来看,将战略理论与股利分配理论结合起来,拓展了战略理论在财务研究中的应用。从实践上来看,企业要结合自身战略选择制定现金股利政策,采用差异化战略的企业为缓解融资约束,应采用稳健的现金股利政策。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	冯展斌
	李国民

关键词：战略差异现金股利产权性质市场化水平融资约束

Abstract： Based on the financial data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2018 and from the perspective of financing constraints, this paper empirically examines the impact of corporate strategic differences on cash dividend policy, as well as the regulatory effects of the nature of property rights and the level of marketization on the relationship between them. It is found that corporate strategy difference will reduce cash dividend payment tendency and cash dividend payment level, while the state-owned property right and the higher marketization level weaken the negative impact of corporate strategy difference on cash dividend policy. Further research shows that the strategic difference reduces the tendency and level of cash dividend payment by increasing the degree of financing constraint.In theory,the combination of strategic theory and dividend distribution theory expands the application of strategic theory in financial research.The results show that enterprises should formulate cash dividend policies based on their own strategic choices, and enterprises with differentiation strategies should adopt prudent cash dividend policies to alleviate financing constraints.

Keywords： Strategic Difference Cash Dividends Nature of Property Rights Marketization Level Financing Constraints

收稿日期 2021-01-10; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目(72002068)

作者简介: 冯展斌(1987— ),男,山东日照人,博士,讲师,主要从事金融理论与政策研究;李国民(1967— ),男,河南新乡人,博士,教授,主要从事金融理论与政策研究。

引用本文:

冯展斌, 李国民.差异化战略下现金股利政策研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2022,2: 141-151

FENG Zhanbin, LI Guomin.A Study on Cash Dividend Policy under Differentiation Strategy[J] Economic Survey, 2022,V39(2): 141-151

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I2/141

鲍新中,孙晔,陶秋燕,等,2014.竞争战略、创新研发与企业绩效的关系研究[J].中国科技论坛(6):63-69.
代光伦,邓建平,曾勇,2012.金融发展、政府控制与融资约束[J].管理评论(5):21-29.
雷光勇,刘慧龙,2007.市场化进程、最终控制人性质与现金股利行为:来自中国A股公司的经验证据[J].管理世界(7):120-128.
雷光勇,王文忠,刘茉,2015.政治不确定性、股利政策调整与市场效应[J].会计研究(4):33-39.
李志刚,施先旺,2016.战略差异、管理层特征与银行借款契约:基于风险承担的视角[J].中南财经政法大学学报(2):68-77.
刘津宇,王正位,朱武祥,2014.产权性质、市场化改革与融资歧视:来自上市公司投资-现金流敏感性的证据[J].南开管理评论(5):126-135.
刘名旭,李来儿,2019.战略差异、财务柔性与经营业绩波动[J].山西财经大学学报(12):80-92.
孙佩红,张力方,2020.战略差异度与企业绩效倒U型关系检验:基于制造业上市公司的经验数据[J].财经理论研究(4):73-85.
全怡,梁上坤,付宇翔,2016.货币政策、融资约束与现金股利[J].金融研究(11):63-79.
王化成,侯粲然,刘欢,2019.战略定位差异、业绩期望差距与企业违约风险[J].南开管理评论(4):4-19.
王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏,2019.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.
温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,2004.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报(5):614-620.
吴春贤,张静,2017.金融发展与现金股利政策分析:基于融资约束与自由现金流的检验[J].商业研究(6):69-78.
徐寿福,邓鸣茂,陈晶萍,2016.融资约束、现金股利与投资-现金流敏感性[J].山西财经大学学报(2):112-124.
叶康涛,董雪雁,崔倚菁,2015.企业战略定位与会计盈余管理行为选择[J].会计研究(10):23-29.
叶康涛,张姗姗,张艺馨,2014.企业战略差异与会计信息的价值相关性[J].会计研究(5):44-51.
于泽,钱智俊,方庆,等,2017.数量管制、流动性错配和公司高额持有现金:来自上市公司的证据[J].管理世界(2):67-84.
张纯,吕伟,2009.信息环境,融资约束与现金股利[J].金融研究(7):81-94.
郑兵云,陈圻,李邃,2011.差异化战略对企业绩效的影响研究:基于创新的中介视角[J].科学学研究(9):1402-1413.
周建波,曾江,李婧,2021.农村金融与清代江南的早期工业化:以农民兼营手工业为中心[J].中国农史(2):48-60.
BARON R M,KENNY D A,1986.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual,strategic and statistical considerations[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,51(6):1172-1182.
CHEN M J,MILLER D,1994.Competitive attack,retaliation and performance: an expectancy-valence framework[J].Strategic management journal,15(2):85-102.
DIMAGGIO P J,POWELL W W,1983.The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J].American sociological review,48(2):147-160.
FAZZARI S M,HUBBARD R G,PETERSON B C,1988.Financing constraints and corporate investment[Z].Brookings paper on economic activity,(1):141-206.
FLOYD E,LI N,SKINNER D J,2015.Payout policy through the financial crisis: the growth of repurchases and the resilience of dividends[J].Journal of financial economics,118(2):299-316.
GELETKANYCZ M A,HAMBRICK D C,1997.The external ties of top executives: implications for strategic choice and performance[J].Administrative science quarterly,42(4):654-681.
GOLL I,JOHNSON N B,RASHEED A A,2007.Knowledge capability,strategic change,and form performance:the moderating role of the environment[J].Management decision,45(2):161-179.
HADLOCK C,PIERCE J,2010.New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index[J].Review of financial studies,23(5):1909-1940.
KIM O,VERRECCHIA R E,1994.Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcements[J].Journal of accounting and economics,17(1-2):41-67.
KORNAI J,1980.“Hard” and “soft” budget constraint[J].Acta oeconomica,25(3-4):231-245.
LA P R,LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F,SHLEIFER A,et al,1998.Law and finance[J].Journal of political economy,106(6):1113-1155.
LA P R,LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F,SHLEIFER A,et al,2000.Agency problems and dividend policies around the world[J].Journal of finance,55(1):1-33.
LOVE I,2003.Financial development and financing constraints:international evidence from the structural investment model[J].Review of financial studies,16(3):765-791.
MEYER J W,ROWAN B,1977.Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American journal of sociology,83(2):340-363.
MILLER M H,MODIGLIANI F,1961.Dividend policy,growth,and the valuation of shares[J].Journal of business,34(4):411-433.
PORAC J F,THOMAS H,BADEN-FULLER C,1989.Competitive groups as cognitive communities:the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers[J].Journal of management studies,26(4):397-416.
SIRMON D,HITT M,2009.Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities:interdependent effects of resource investment & deployment on firm performance[J].Strategic management journal,30(13):1375-1394.
TANG J Y,CROSSAN M,ROWE W,2011.Dominant CEO,deviant strategy,and extreme performance:the moderating role of a powerful board[J].Journal of management studies,48(7):1479-1503.