Human Capital of Entrepreneurs and the Performance of Returning Home Ventures——An Analysis Based on Survey Data of 2,139 Returning Entrepreneurial Enterprises
WANG Yi1, DING Li1, LIU Na2
1. School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China; 2. School of Business, Shanghai College of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai 200240, China
Abstract：
Based on the survey data of 2139 start-ups collected in 2019, this paper studies the effect of human capital on the performance of start-ups. The results show that: On the whole, the entrepreneur’s education, training, health status and work or occupation have significant positive effects on the business performance. Among the different types of home-going start-ups, the educational level, the post of going out for work or starting a business have significant positive influence on the business performance of the start-up; Entrepreneurial Training can significantly improve the business performance of the development-type Home Entrepreneurial Enterprises, physical health has a significant impact on the survival-type and value-type entrepreneurial performance. Further study found that education level, job or entrepreneurial position, entrepreneurial training has a significant positive impact on the business performance of home-based entrepreneurial enterprises in central and western regions; Entrepreneurial Training and physical health had a significant positive impact on business performance in the secondary sector of the economy and mid and low end service industries. Based on the above conclusions, it is suggested that local governments should formulate policies to strengthen the training for returning home to start-up businesses, especially the technical training for start-up enterprises in the central and western regions.
WANG Yi, DING Li, LIU Na.Human Capital of Entrepreneurs and the Performance of Returning Home Ventures——An Analysis Based on Survey Data of 2,139 Returning Entrepreneurial Enterprises[J] Economic Survey, 2020,V37(6): 28-38
陈艳莹,原毅军,袁鹏.2011.中国高端服务业的内涵、特征与界定[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版) (3):20-26. 李长安.2018.我国四次创业浪潮的演进:从“难民效应”到“企业家效应”[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)(2):1-9. 林琳,陈万明.2018.互联网情境下创业企业创新绩效影响因素研究[J].经济经纬(3):110-116. 刘苓玲,徐雷.2012.中西部地区农民工返乡创业问题研究:基于河南、山西、重庆的调查问卷[J].人口与经济(6):33-38. 任锋,李树茁,刘玲睿.2016.农民工机会性与必要性创业的个人资本差异[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(4):146-156. 孙自铎.2020.新形势下农村改革的路径选择:安徽省解决“三农”问题的探索与实践[J].中国治理评论(1):81-98. 汪三贵,刘湘琳,史识洁,等.2010.人力资本和社会资本对返乡农民工创业的影响[J].农业技术经济 (12):4-10. 王轶,熊文,黄先开.2020.人力资本与返乡创业[J].东岳论丛(3):32-46. 杨鹏,高素英,国慧.2019.创新导向人力资源管理实践对企业绩效的链式中介效应[J].企业经济(1):111-117. 赵浩兴,张巧文.2013.返乡创业农民工人力资本与创业企业成长关系研究:基于江西、贵州两省的实证分析[J].华东经济管理(1):130-133. 朱红根,康兰媛.2013.农民工创业动机及对创业绩效影响的实证分析:基于江西省15个县市的438个返乡创业农民工样本[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版) (5):59-66. BECKER G S.1964.Human capital theory[M].New York:Columbia University Press. GIMENO J,FOLTA T B,COOPER A C.1997.Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4):750-783. KAPLAN R S,NORTON D P.1997.Balanced scorecard :Strategien erfolgreich umsetzen[EB/OL].[2019-10-20].https://www.grin.com/document/66532. SANDBERG W R,HOFER C W.1987.Improving new venture performance:The role of strategy,industry structure,and the entrepreneur[J].Journal of Business venturing,2(1):5-28. SCHULTZ T W.1961.Investment in human capital[J].Economic Journal,51(1):1-17. SCHULTZ T W.1971.Investment in human capital:The role of education[J].Economic Development &Cultural Change,53(4):553-559.
2020 
