企业多样性与知识生产、经营绩效的关系研究 —

摘要基于2015—2017年中国科技企业孵化器统计面板数据,利用辛普森多样性指数方法测度区域创新空间内的企业文化多样性、企业产业多样性和企业人力资本多样性,并通过负二项回归、断尾回归等方法进行实证研究,探讨了区域创新空间内的企业多样性对知识生产和经营绩效的影响。研究发现:区域创新空间内的企业多样性和知识生产、经营绩效均存在显著的倒U形相关关系,即随着企业多样性程度的不断提高,企业的知识生产能力和经营绩效水平呈现出先升后降的变化趋势。此外,知识生产能力的提升应主要关注文化多样性,经营绩效水平的提升应主要关注产业相关多样性。本研究丰富和拓展了企业多样性与创新关系研究的维度和结论,有助于理解区域空间内的企业组成、结构和联系,进而提升知识产出和经济绩效。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	袁祥飞
	关成华

关键词：区域创新空间企业多样性孵化器知识生产经营绩效

Abstract： Over the past thirty years, technology innovation has been the critical strategy of Chinese government, and technology business incubators (TBIs) were expected to play a primary role in the process. After the “mass entrepreneurship and innovation” initiative was proposed in 2014, the number of TBIs in China had soared to 4,069 in 2017. Although there are abundant literatures on the relationship between TBIs and universities and research institutes, few are focusing on the inner structure of TBIs, especially from the diversity perspective. Based on the statistical panel data of Chinese incubators from 2015 to 2017, by using the Simpson Diversity Index, this paper measures the cultural diversity, industrial diversity and educational diversity of founders of enterprises in the regional innovation space. Through negative binomial regression model and truncated regression model, this paper discusses the influence of enterprise diversity in regional innovation space on knowledge creation and business performance. And it is found that: 1) there are significant inverted u-shaped relationships among enterprise diversity, knowledge creation and business performance, namely with the constant improvement of enterprise diversity in regional innovation space, knowledge creation and business performance firstly increase and then decrease. 2) The improvement of knowledge creation ability should mainly focus on cultural diversity, while the improvement of business performance should mainly focus on industrial diversity. In addition, two pieces of advice are supplied: one is to plan the appropriate internal enterprise structure of TBIs, the second is to make proper innovation strategy.

Keywords： Regional Innovation Space Enterprise Diversity Incubators Knowledge Creation Business Performance

收稿日期 2019-02-18; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:科技部火炬高技术产业开发中心专项基金(2018WTY08001);北京市科学技术委员会软科学项目(Z181100007418004)

作者简介: 袁祥飞(1981— ),男,山东平度人,博士,主要从事创新理论与实践研究;关成华(1968— ),男,满族,教授,博士生导师,主要从事创新理论与实践、绿色经济研究。

引用本文:

袁祥飞, 关成华.企业多样性与知识生产、经营绩效的关系研究 ——基于区域创新空间视角的分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2020,2: 19-26

YUAN Xiangfei, GUAN Chenghua.A Research on the Relationships of Enterprise Diversity and Knowledge Creation, Business Performance ——An Analysis from Regional Innovation Space Perspective[J] Economic Survey, 2020,V37(2): 19-26

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V37/I2/19

杜海东.2014.创业团队经验异质性对进入战略创新的影响:创业学习的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理(1):132-139.
关成华,袁祥飞.2018.直接投资、财政补贴和税收优惠:基于全国孵化器数据的比较研究[J].北京社会科学(8):107-119.
李强,韩伯棠,李晓轩.2006.知识生产函数研究与实践述评[J].经济问题探索(1):24-27.
陆远权,秦佳佳.2018.中国城市规模分布对区域创新效率的影响研究[J].经济经纬(6):1-7.
罗勇,王亚,范祚军.2013.异质型人力资本、地区专业化与收入差距:基于新经济地理学视角[J].中国工业经济(2):31-43.
苏楠,肖晓勇,宋来胜.2016.外部知识、本地知识多样化类型对地区创新能力影响的实证研究:基于2000—2011年的动态面板数据的广义矩分析[J].经济经纬(5):19-23.
王俊松.2016.集聚经济、相关性多样化与城市经济增长:基于279个地级及以上城市面板数据的实证分析[J].财经研究(5):135-144.
王颖,彭灿.2012.知识异质性与知识创新绩效的关系研究[J].科技进步与对策(4):119-123.
杨胜刚,张一帆.2017.风险投资对企业创新的影响:基于中小板和创业板的研究[J].经济经纬(2):147-152.
杨振兵,张诚.2015.文化非正式制度是外资企业生产的催化剂吗?——来自中国省际工业部门的经验证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报(2):54-63.
张红宇,蒋玉石,杨力,等.2016.区域创新网络中的交互学习与信任演化研究[J].管理世界(3):68-73.
BACKSTROM L, HUTTENLOCHE D, KLEIBERG J, et al. 2006. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution[C]. Proceedings of the 12t Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. New York: ACM.
BEERS C, ZAND F. 2014. R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2) :292-312.
BEN-AMAR W, CHANG M, MCILKENNY P. 2017. Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2):369-383.
CABRAL L, WAND Z, XU D Y. 2013. Competitors, complementors, parents and places: Explaining regional agglomeration in the U.S. auto industry [J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 30(6):1-29.
DUYSTERS G, LOKSHIN B.2011. Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4):570-585.
FAEMS D, JANSSENS M, MADHOK A, et al.2008.Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6):1053-1078.
FANG E, LEE J, PALMATIER R, et al. 2016.If it takes a village to foster innovation, success depends on the neighbors the effects of global and ego networks on new product launches[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3):319-337.
FLORIDA R. 2002. The rise of the creative class[M]. New York: Basic Books.
FLORIDA R, MELLANDER C, STOLARICK K. 2008. Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5):615-649.
GIRVAN M, NEWMAN M E J.2002. Community structure in social and biological networks[J]. PNAS, 99(12):7821-7826.
HUSTON M. 1979.A general hypothesis of species diversity[J]. The American Naturalist, 113(1):81-101.
JACOBS J. 1969. The economy of cities[M]. New York: Vintage.
MARSHALL A. 1890. Principles of economics (8th Ed.) [M]. London: Macmillan.
NATHAN M, LEE N. 2013. Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Firm-level evidence from London[J]. Economic Geography, 89(4):367-394.
ROMER P M.1990.Endogenous technological change[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5):71-102.
VAN WIJK R, JANSEN J P, VAN DEN BOSCH A J, et al. 2012. How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: A study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(9): 929-950.
WILLIAMS T R. 1999. Exploring the impact of study abroad on students’ intercultural communication skills: Adaptability and sensitivity[J]. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(4):356-371.