迭代创新视角下资源选择性配置对平台型企业成长的影响

摘要融合资源配置与迭代创新前沿研究成果,构建“选择性配置-迭代创新-平台型企业成长”理论框架,利用分层线性回归方法验证研究命题,探究平台型企业成长之道。对来自京、津、鲁、豫等地区160家企业的实证研究表明:(1)资源的选择性配置对平台型企业成长具有积极作用;(2)选择性配置促进迭代创新的迅捷行动与持续改进,后者有利于企业成长;(3)作为迭代创新的基本维度,迅捷行动与持续改进在选择性配置与企业成长之间发挥中介作用。对于企业成长,资源配置比企业所掌握的资源量具有更为重要的作用。研究有助于完善互联网背景下平台型企业成长机理,探究迭代创新驱动机制,并区分维度考察迭代创新中介作用,丰富迭代创新量化研究,推动其理论发展,丰富资源配置的研究成果,促进研究视野从资源静态属性向企业对资源的动态调配拓展。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张腾
	朱晓红

关键词：资源配置选择性配置迭代创新平台型企业企业成长

Abstract： Based on the frontier research results of resource allocation and iterative innovation, this paper constructs the theoretical framework of “alternative allocation-iterative innovation-platform enterprise growth”, and uses the method of hierarchical linear regression to verify the research proposition to explore the way of platform enterprise growth. This paper draws the following conclusions through the empirical study of 160 enterprises from Beijing, Tianjin, Shandong, Henan and other regions. (1) Alternative resource allocation has a positive influence on Internet platform firms' growth. (2) Alternative allocation can promote the swift action and continuous improvement of iterative innovation, which is conducive to the growth of enterprises. (3) As the basic dimension of iterative innovation, swift action and continuous improvement play an intermediary role between alternative allocation and enterprise growth. For the growth of enterprises, resource allocation plays a more important role than the amount of resources owned by enterprises. This research is helpful for us to improve the growth mechanism of platform enterprises under the internet background, explore the driving mechanism of iterative innovation, investigate the intermediary role of iterative innovation from different dimensions, enrich the quantitative research of iterative innovation, promote its theoretical development, enrich the research results of resource allocation, and promote the expansion of research vision from static attributes of resources to the dynamic allocation of resources.

Keywords： Resource Allocation Alternative Allocation Iterative Innovation Internet Platform Firms Enterprise Growth

收稿日期 2020-08-28; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2019CJJ069;2018BJJ011)

作者简介: 张腾(1985— ),男,河南许昌人,博士,讲师,主要从事企业创新与成长研究;朱晓红(1985— ),女,山东济南人,博士,副教授,主要从事企业创新与创业研究。

引用本文:

张腾, 朱晓红.迭代创新视角下资源选择性配置对平台型企业成长的影响[J]. 经济经纬, 2022,3: 119-127

ZHANG Teng, ZHU Xiaohong.The Influence of Alternative Resource Allocation on the Growth of Platform Enterprises from the Perspective of Iterative Innovation[J] Economic Survey, 2022,V39(3): 119-127

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I3/119

陈凌,曹正汉,2007.制度与能力:中国民营企业20年成长的解析[M].上海:上海人民出版社.
葛法权,张玉利,张腾,2017.组织相互依赖关系对公司创业能力的影响机制:基于海尔集团的案例研究[J].管理学报(4):475-484.
郭海,韩佳平,2019.数字化情境下开放式创新对新创企业成长的影响:商业模式创新的中介作用[J].管理评论(6):186-198.
李全升,苏秦,2019.市场导向、迭代式创新与新产品开发[J].管理学报(12):1790-1799.
刘骏,张蕾,陈雪,2019.创新驱动背景下企业创新速度对创新成果的作用机制研究[J].科技进步与对策(14):108-114.
刘芸,王涛,顾新,2019.企业创新网络中组织声誉对创新绩效的影响:知识合作的中介作用与网络特征的调节作用[J].经济经纬(4):102-109.
罗仲伟,任国良,焦豪,等,2014.动态能力、技术范式转变与创新战略:基于腾讯微信“整合”与“迭代”微创新的纵向案例分析[J].管理世界(8):152-168.
欧绍华,查君,2020.创业拼凑对新企业资源获取的动态影响研究:基于创业学习的中介效应[J].经济经纬(3):125-133.
王凤彬, 王骁鹏, 张驰,2019.超模块平台组织结构与客制化创业支持基于海尔向平台组织转型的嵌入式案例研究[J].管理世界(2):127-156,205-206.
王节祥,杨洋,邱毅,等,2021.身份差异化:垂直互联网平台企业成长战略研究[J].中国工业经济(9):174-192.
张杰盛,李海刚,韩丽川,2017.虚拟社区互动性对迭代创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].工业工程与管理(5):128-134.
张军扩,侯永志,刘培林,等,2019.高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J].管理世界(7):1-7.
张腾,张玉利,2017.迭代式创新关键维度、机制与理论模型构建:基于海尔创业“小微”的多案例研究[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版)(3):46-54.
张腾,朱晓红,2018.期权型资源配置对企业竞争优势的影响:探索式创新的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策(1):97-106.
赵忠伟,李睿,朱冰洁,2019.组织柔性对中小型高科技企业成长影响研究[J].科研管理(7):247-256.
朱晓红,陈寒松,张腾,2019a.知识经济背景下平台型企业构建过程中的迭代创新模式:基于动态能力视角的双案例研究[J].管理世界(3):142-156.
朱晓红,赵金国,张金霞,2019b.企业-用户互动对新创企业创新绩效的影响:迭代创新的研究视角[J].山东社会科学(9):136-141.
BARON R M,KENNY D A,1986.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations[J].Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6):1173-1182.
BAUM J R,BIRD B J,2010.The successful intelligence of high-growth entrepreneurs:links to new venture growth[J].Organization science,21(2):397－412.
CHANDLER G N,DETIENNE D R,MCKELVIE A, et al,2011.Causation and effectuation processes:a validation study[J].Journal of business venturing,26(3):375-390.
DUMAINE B,1989.How managers can succeed through speed[J].Fortune, 13(2):54-59.
ELLWOOD P,GRIMSHAW P,PANDZA K,2017.Accelerating the innovation process:a systematic review and realist synthesis of the research literature[J].International journal of management reviews,(19):510-530.
FITZGERALD E,2011.Inside real innovation:how the right approach can move ideas from R&D to market and get the economy moving[M].Hackensack:World scientific publishing.
KATILA R,AHUJA G,2012.Something old, something new:a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J].Academy of management journal, 45(6):1183-1194.
KESSLER E H,CHAKRABARTI A K,1996.Innovation speed:a conceptual model of context, antecedents and outcomes[J].The academy of management review, 21(4):1143-1191.
KLINGEBIEL R,RAMMER C,2014.Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management[J].Strategic management journal, 35(2):246-268.
KLINGEBIEL R,ADNER R,2015.Real options logic revisited:the performance effects of alternative resource allocation regimes[J].Academy of management journal,58(1):221-241.
LEIPONEN A,HELFAT C,2010.Innovation objectives, knowledge sources and the benefits of breadth[J].Strategic management journal,31(2):224-236.
MIRABEAU L,MAGUIRE S,2014.From autonomous strategic behavior to emergent strategy[J].Strategic management journal,35(8):1202-1229.
PACHECO-DE-ALMEIDA G,HAWK A,YEUNG B,2015.The right speed and its value[J].Strategic management journal,36(2):159-176.
SATISH N,DONALD S,MARTIN K,2018.On open innovation, platforms and entrepreneurship[J].Strategic entrepreneurship journal,12:354-368.
SCHILKE O,2014.On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage:the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism[J].Strategic management journal, 5(2):179-203.
TRIGEORGIS L,REUER J J,2017.Real options theory in strategic management[J].Strategic management journal,38(1):42-63.