经济经纬
         首页        期刊介绍        编 委 会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        学术影响        广告合作        联系我们        留 言 板       
    经济经纬 2019 Issue (5) :64-71
    国际经济 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
    开放度水平提升是否促进了区域经济增长?——基于“一带一路”沿线国家面板数据的实证分析
马卫1, 曹小曙2, 李涛2, 高兴川1
1.陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119;
2.陕西师范大学 西北国土资源研究中心,陕西 西安 710119
    Does the Increase of Openness Promote Regional Economic Growth? —An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data of Countries Along the “one Belt and one Road”
    MA Wei1,CAO Xiao-shu2,LI Tao2,GAO Xing-chuan1
1.College of Geography and Tourism,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China;
2.Center for Land Resource Research in Northwest China,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China
摘要
参考文献
相关文章
     Download: PDF (1367KB)   HTML 1KB   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 基于“一带一路”沿线66个国家2000—2015年的面板数据,构建开放度综合评价指标,并利用面板数据模型系统探讨了开放度对沿线国家经济增长的影响。研究发现:“一带一路”沿线国家开放度水平总体呈上升趋势,年平均增长率为5.24%,总体上,开放度对“一带一路”沿线国家经济增长有显著正向影响,但不存在倒U形影响。分时段来看,2000—2008年开放度对经济增长有显著促进作用,而2008年以后,开放度对经济增长的影响呈下降趋势。分区域来看,开放度对中东欧、独联体、南亚经济增长的正向影响较大,而对中亚、西亚-北非的正向影响较小。分不同经济水平国家来看,呈纺锤体形影响,即开放度对中高收入国家影响较大,而对高收入和中低及以下收入国家影响相对较小
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马卫
曹小曙
李涛
高兴川
关键词开放度   经济增长   时空格局   “一带一路”     
Abstract: Based on the panel data of 66 countries from 2000 to 2015, this paper systematically examines the impact of openness on economic growth of countries along the “Belt and Road” (BRI) by developing a comprehensive evaluation index system of openness and adopting the panel data model. The empirical results show that first, openness presents a rising trend year by year, with an average annual growth rate of 5.24%. Second, on the whole, openness has a significant positive impact on economic growth, but shows no Kuznets Curve effect. Third, from a temporal perspective, openness significantly promoted economic growth from 2000 to 2008, but after 2008, the impact showed a downward trend. Fourth, from a regional perspective, openness has a greater positive impact on economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe, Community of Independent States and South Asia, as opposed to that on Central Asia、West Asia/North Africa. At last, from the perspective of countries with different economic levels, there exists a spindle effect. In other words, openness has a greater positive impact on upper and middle income countries and a smaller impact on other countries
KeywordsOpenness   Economic Growth   Spatio-temporal Pattern   “Belt and Road”(BRI)     
收稿日期 2018-12-17; 接受日期 ;
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41831284;41671160);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(18SZYB01)
通讯作者 曹小曙(1970— ),男,甘肃灵台人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事交通地理、土地利用规划等研究;   
作者简介: 马卫(1988— ),男,江苏泰州人,博士研究生,主要从事交通地理与区域发展研究;李涛(1985— ),男,山西长治人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事交通地理与区域发展研究;高兴川(1987— ),男,重庆梁平人,博士研究生,主要从事交通地理与土地利用研究。
引用本文:   
马卫, 曹小曙, 李涛, 高兴川.开放度水平提升是否促进了区域经济增长?——基于“一带一路”沿线国家面板数据的实证分析[J].  经济经纬, 2019,5: 64-71
MA Wei,CAO Xiao-shu,LI Tao,GAO Xing-chuan.Does the Increase of Openness Promote Regional Economic Growth? —An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data of Countries Along the “one Belt and one Road”[J]  Economic Survey, 2019,V36(5): 64-71
链接本文:  
http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/     或     http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V36/I5/64
Copyright 2012 by 经济经纬