文化距离与中国海外并购绩效:基于跨国并购经验的实证研究

摘要以96家沪深上市公司2010—2015年期间1150起海外并购案例为样本,从文化视角探讨跨国并购企业的异质性,实证分析了跨国并购企业所在区域文化的异质性对跨国并购绩效的影响。结果表明:东道国的文化距离、区域水稻文化都会降低中国上市公司的跨国并购绩效, 并且并购规模越大,文化距离、水稻文化的负面影响越大;上市公司的海外并购经验能够减缓文化距离和水稻文化对于海外投资规模绩效的负面影响,提升中国上市公司的海外投资绩效,但是随着并购规模的加大,这种正面效应会减弱

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	裴瑱
	彭飞

关键词：文化距离南稻北麦海外并购绩效

Abstract： Taking 1150 overseas mergers and acquisitions (M&A) cases of 96 Shanghai and Shenzhen listed companies during the period 2010-2015 as samples, this paper explores the heterogeneity of cross-border M&A from a cultural perspective and empirically analyzes the influence of regional culture heterogeneity on the performance of cross-border M&A. The results show that the cultural distance of host country and regional rice culture will reduce the performance of cross-border M&A of Chinese listed companies. The larger the scale of M&A, the greater the negative impact of cultural distance and rice culture. Overseas M&A experience of listed companies can mitigate the negative impact of cultural distance and rice culture on the scale performance of overseas investment, and thus enhance the overseas investment performance of Chinese listed companies. But the positive effect will weaken as the scale of M&A increases

Keywords： Cultural Distance Rice-Wheat Culture Overseas M& A Performance

收稿日期 2018-11-29; 接受日期 ;

作者简介: 裴瑱(1967— ),女,河南新野人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事宏观经济研究;彭飞(1975— ),男,江西吉安人,博士,副教授,主要从事区域劳动经济学研究。

引用本文:

裴瑱, 彭飞.文化距离与中国海外并购绩效:基于跨国并购经验的实证研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2019,5: 72-78

PEI Zhen,PENG Fei.Cultural Distance and China’s Overseas M&A Performance: An Empirical Study Based on Cross-border M&A Experience[J] Economic Survey, 2019,V36(5): 72-78

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V36/I5/72

孔群喜,王紫绮.2019.对外直接投资如何影响中国经济增长质量:事实与机制[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)(1):112-126.
李进龙,吕巍,郭冰. 2012. 制度约束、国家文化差异与企业跨国并购绩效[J].上海管理科学(4):12-16.
刘晓宁. 2018. 企业对外直接投资区位选择——东道国因素与企业异质性因素的共同考察[J]. 经济经纬(3):65-72.
慕绣如,李荣林,孟寒. 2016. 中国对非洲直接投资动机分析——兼论东道国制度因素的影响[J]. 经济经纬(6):66-71.
王艳,阚铄. 2014. 企业文化与并购绩效[J]. 管理世界(11):146-157.
闫雪凌,胡阳. 2016. 制度、文化与中国OFDI的利益动机[J].南方经济(6):1-17.
阎大颖. 2009. 制度约束与中国企业跨国并购的经营绩效[J]. 山西财经大学学报(1):63-70.
余鹏翼,王满四.2014. 国内上市公司跨国并购绩效影响因素的实证研究[J]. 会计研究(3):64-70.
HAYWARD M L A. 2002.When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995[J]. Strategic Management Journal,23(1):21-39.
HITT M A, HOSKISSON R E, KIM H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal,40(4):767-798.
HOFSTEDE G, MAASTRICHT U O. 2015. Do American theories apply in China? [J].Cross-Cultural Management,3(1):21-27.
KANG L, PENG, F, ZHU Y, et al. 2018. Harmony in diversity: Can One Belt One Road initiative promote China`s OFDI? [J]. Sustainability,10(9):1-28.
KOGUT B, SINGH H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,19(3):411-432.
LEE T J, CAVES R E. 1998. Uncertain outcomes of foreign investment: Determinants of the dispersion of profits after large acquisitions[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,29(3):563-581.
MUEHLFELD K, SAHIB P R, VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN A. 2012. A contextual theory of organizational learning from failures and successes: A study of acquisition completion in the global newspaper industry, 1981—2008[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8):938-964.
PENG F, KANG L, JIANG J. 2013. Selection and institutional shareholder activism in Chinese acquisitions[J]. Management Decision,51(1):141-162.
TALHELM T, ZHANG X, OISHI S, et al.2014.Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture[J]. Science, 344(6184):603-608.