上级发展性反馈对员工建言行为影响的双路径分析——基于社会交换理论与社会认知理论的视角

摘要基于社会交换理论和社会认知理论,以领导-成员交换和建言效能感为中介变量,构建了上级发展性反馈对员工建言行为的双路径影响模型,通过476套上级-员工配对数据对研究假设进行验证。结果表明:上级发展性反馈对领导-成员交换、员工建言效能感和建言行为均具有显著正向;领导-成员交换和建言效能感对上级发展性反馈与员工建言行为之间的关系有部分中介作用;领导-成员交换的中介效应在上级发展性反馈与员工建言行为关系中的解释力度大于建言效能感的中介效应解释力度

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	苏伟琳
	林新奇

关键词：上级发展性反馈领导—成员交换建言效能感建言行为

Abstract： Based on social exchange theory and social cognitive theory, this study takes leader-member exchange and voice efficacy as mediating variables and constructs a dual path impact model of supervisor developmental feedback on employees’ voice behaviors. It then test the hypotheses by using 476 sets of supervisor-employee pairing data. The results show that supervisor developmental feedback has a significant positive influence on leader-member exchange, employee’s voice efficacy, and on voice behavior. Besides, both leader-member exchange and employee’s voice efficacy partly mediate the influence of supervisor developmental feedback on employee’s voice behavior. Meanwhile, the mediating role of leader-member exchange in the relationship between supervisor developmental feedback and employee’s voice behavior is greater than that of employee’s voice efficacy.

Keywords： Supervisor Developmental Feedback Leader-Member Exchange Voice Efficacy Voice Behavior

收稿日期 2018-11-15; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)(17XNH047)

作者简介: 苏伟琳(1990— ),男,山东临沂人,博士研究生,主要从事人力资源开发与技术研究;林新奇(1962— ),男,福建莆田人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事人力资源开发与管理研究。

引用本文:

苏伟琳, 林新奇.上级发展性反馈对员工建言行为影响的双路径分析——基于社会交换理论与社会认知理论的视角[J]. 经济经纬, 2019,5: 112-119

SU Wei-lin, LIN Xin-qi.The Dual Path Influence Analysis of Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employee’s Voice Behavior —Based on Social Exchange Theory and Social Cognitive Theory[J] Economic Survey, 2019,V36(5): 112-119

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V36/I5/112

段锦云,魏秋江. 2012. 建言效能感结构及其在员工建言行为发生中的作用[J]. 心理学报(7):972-985.
苏伟琳,林新奇. 2018. 上级发展性反馈能否抑制员工沉默? 一个被中介的调节模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理(11):158-170.
王永跃,段锦云. 2015. 政治技能如何影响员工建言:关系及绩效的作用[J]. 管理世界(3):102-112.
徐珺,尚玉钒,宋合义. 2018. 上级发展性反馈与创造力:一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 管理科学(1).69-78
张亚军,张金隆,张军伟,等.2017. 谦卑型领导与员工抑制性建言的关系研究[J]. 管理评论(5):110-119.
BANDURA A. 2011. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory [J]. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology,4(3):359-373.
BURRIS E R, DETERT J R, CHIABURU D S. 2008. Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4): 912–922.
CROPAMZANO R, ANTHONY E L, DANIELS S R, et al. 2017. Exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies [J]. Academy of Management Annals,11(1):1-38.
ELIZABETH W, MORRSION E W. 2011. Employee voice behavior:Integration and directions for future research [J]. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1):373-412.
GRAEN G, DANSEREAU F, MINAMI T. 1972. Dysfunctional leadership styles [J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,7(2):216-236.
KUVAAS B, BUCH R, DYSVIK A. 2017. Constructive supervisor feedback is not sufficient: Immediacy and frequency is essential [J]. Human Resource Management, 56(3):519-531.
LAW K S, WONG C S, WANG D, et al. 2000. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4): 751-765.
LIANG J, FARH C I C, FATH J L. 2012. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination [J]. Academy of Management Journal,55(1):71-92.
PREACHER K J, HAYES A F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3):879-891.
ZHOU J. 2003. When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3): 413-422.