数据规制政策差异如何影响数字产品出口质量？

摘要基于CEPII和ECIPE-DTE数据库,考察数据规制政策差异对数字产品出口质量的影响。研究发现:数据规制政策差异的扩大显著抑制了数字产品出口质量升级,该结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后仍成立。机制分析表明,数据规制政策差异主要通过增加贸易成本和抑制技术创新阻碍数字产品出口质量提升,但RTA数字贸易规则具有调节效应,能够削弱数据规制政策差异对数字产品出口质量升级的抑制作用。异质性分析表明,国内数据规制政策差异对数字产品出口质量升级的抑制作用更大,数据规制政策差异对杂项电子产品之外的其他四类数字产品出口质量的抑制作用更显著,发达国家间的数据规制政策差异更显著地抑制了数字产品出口质量升级。研究结论为制度型开放背景下,中国高水平数据治理体系建立和数字贸易强国建设提供参考依据。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈迁影
	刘志中

关键词：数据规制政策差异数字产品出口质量贸易成本

Abstract： Based on the CEPII and ECIPE-DTE databases, this study examines the impact of data regulation policy differences on the quality of digital product exports. The results show that the expansion of differences in data regulation policies has significantly hindered the quality upgrading of digital product exports. This conclusion remains valid after a series of robustness tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that differences in data regulation policies primarily hinder the improvement of digital product export quality by increasing trade costs and suppressing technological innovation. However, the digital trade rules of RTA have a moderating effect and can weaken the inhibitory effect of the differences in data regulation policies on the quality upgrading of digital product exports. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that differences in domestic data regulatory policies have a stronger inhibitory effect on the quality upgrading of digital product exports. Specifically, differences in data regulatory policies exert a more significant inhibitory effect on the export quality of the four categories of digital products other than miscellaneous electronic products. Additionally, differences in data regulatory policies among developed countries more notably inhibit the quality upgrading of digital product exports. The conclusion provides a reference basis for the establishment of a high-level data governance system and the construction of a digital trade power in the context of institutionalized opening up in China.

Keywords： Data Regulatory Policy Differences Digital Products Export Quality Trade Cost

收稿日期 2025-03-30; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金西部项目(24XJL001);国家社会科学基金一般项目(24BJL067)

通讯作者 刘志中(1981— ),男,辽宁沈阳人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事国际贸易理论与政策研究。

作者简介: 陈迁影(1995— ),女,黑龙江泰来人,博士,讲师,主要从事区域经济合作研究。

引用本文:

陈迁影, 刘志中.数据规制政策差异如何影响数字产品出口质量？[J]. 经济经纬, 2025,6: 59-72

CHEN Qianying, LIU Zhizhong.How Do Differences in Data Regulatory Policies Affect the Quality of Digital Product Exports?[J] Economic Survey, 2025,V42(6): 59-72

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V42/I6/59

陈迁影,刘志中,2024.数字知识产权规则深化与中国数字产品出口质量升级[J].国际贸易问题(5):142-158.
陈寰琦,2020.签订“跨境数据自由流动”能否有效促进数字贸易:基于OECD服务贸易数据的实证研究[J].国际经贸探索(10):4-21.
代丽华,周灵灵,陆静雯,2024.RTAs框架下跨境数据流动规则对数字服务贸易的影响研究[J].国际贸易(3):72-85.
代中强,孙全刚,2024.自由贸易协定知识产权保护深度与出口产品质量:基于亚太区域贸易协定文本的量化研究[J].统计研究(2):40-52.
党修宇,殷凤,2024.数据规制政策差异与服务业价值链关联[J].国际贸易问题(2): 17-33.
高疆,盛斌,2024.跨境数据流动与数字贸易:国内监管与国际规则[J].国际经贸探索(6):102-120.
黄先海,卿陶,2020.双向知识产权保护与企业出口动态[J].财贸经济(4):99-114.
黄先海,王瀚迪,孙涌铭,等,2023.数字技术与企业出口质量升级:来自专利文本机器学习的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究(12):69-89.
黄宁,李杨,2017.“三难选择”下跨境数据流动规制的演进与成因[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(5):172-182.
黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林,2019.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济(8):5-23.
金祥义,施炳展,2022.互联网搜索、信息成本与出口产品质量[J].中国工业经济(8):99-117.
蒋为,陈星达,彭淼,等,2023.数字规制政策、外部性治理与技术创新:基于数字投入与契约不完全的双重视角[J].中国工业经济(7):66-83.
李墨丝,2021.欧美日跨境数据流动规则的博弈与合作[J].国际贸易(2):82-88.
李仁宇,钟腾龙,祝树金,2020.区域合作、自由贸易协定与企业出口产品质量[J].世界经济研究(12):48-64.
李唐,李青,陈楚霞,2020.数据管理能力对企业生产率的影响效应:来自中国企业—劳动力匹配调查的新发现[J].中国工业经济(6):174-192.
齐俊妍,强华俊,2022.跨境数据流动限制、数字服务投入与制造业出口技术复杂度[J].产业经济研究(1):114-128.
齐俊妍,高明,2019.服务贸易的边境内措施影响了双边服务出口吗:基于跨国行业的面板数据检验[J].国际贸易问题(6):101-116.
施炳展,王有鑫,李坤望,2013.中国出口产品品质测度及其决定因素[J].世界经济(9):69-93.
魏浩,王超男,2023.外国知识产权保护、产品组合调整与中国出口高质量发展[J].中国工业经济(6):81-98.
王雅琦,谭小芬,张金慧,等,2018.人民币汇率、贸易方式与产品质量[J].金融研究(3):71-88.
吴翌琳,2019.国家数字竞争力指数构建与国际比较研究[J].统计研究(11):14-25.
夏杰长,张雅俊,2024.数字贸易中跨境数据流动的规制困境与优化路径[J].经济纵横(4):39-46.
许统生,马添翼,余昌龙,2022.贸易政策冲击与中国数字产业出口产品质量升级[J].当代财经(3):102-113.
杨连星,王秋硕,张秀敏,2023.自由贸易协定深化、数字贸易规则与数字贸易发展[J].世界经济(4):32-59.
殷凤,党修宇,李平,2023.区域贸易协定中数据流动规则深化对服务出口国内增加值的影响[J].国际贸易问题(1):55-72.
张先锋,程亚波,李辉,2024.数据跨境流动规则如何影响制造业全球价值链分工地位[J].国际贸易问题(4):67-86.
周念利,姚亭亭,2021.跨境数据流动限制对数字服务进口的影响测度及异质性考察[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)(2):1-15.
郑枫,彭羽,2023.FTA深度与国家出口产品质量:条款异质性视角[J].世界经济研究(4):33-46.
赵文霞,刘洪愧,2020.贸易壁垒对出口产品质量的影响[J].经济评论(4):144-160.
张国峰,蒋灵多,刘双双,2022.数字贸易壁垒是否抑制了出口产品质量升级[J].财贸经济(12):144-160.
BOYNE S M, 2018. Data protection in the United States[J]. American journal of comparative law, 66(1): 299-343.
BUCKLEY P J, HASHAI N, 2020. Skepticism toward globalization, technological knowledge flows and the emergence of a new global system[J]. Global strategy journal, 10(1): 94-122.
BUTHE T, MILNER H V, 2008. The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: increasing FDI through international trade agreements?[J]. American journal of political science, 52(4): 741-762.
BURRI M, POLANCO R, 2020. Digital trade provisions in preferential trade agreements: introducing a new dataset[J]. Journal of international economic law, 23(1): 187-220.
CASALINI F, GONZALEA J Z, 2019. Trade and cross-border data flows[Z]. OECD trade policy papers No. 220.
DOAN H T T, ZHANG H Y, 2023. Technical barriers to trade, product quality and trade margins: firm-level evidence[Z]. ERIA working papers No. 54.
ELSIG M, KLOTZ S, 2021. Digital trade rules in preferential trade agreements: is there a WTO impact?[J]. Global policy, 12(4): 25-36.
FAN H, LI Y, YEAPLE Y, 2015. Trade liberalization, quality and export prices[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 97(5): 1033-1051.
FERRACANE M F, MAREL E V D, 2020. Do data policy restrictions impact the productivity performance of firms and industries?[J]. Review of international economics, 28(3): 676-722.
GLASS A J, WU X, 2007. Intellectual property rights and quality improvement[J]. Journal of development economics, 82(2): 393-415.
HALLAK J C, SCHOTT J, 2011. Estimating cross-country differences in product quality[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 126(1): 417-474.
KHANDELWAL A K, SCHOTT P K, WEI S J, 2013. Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: evidence from Chinese exporters[J]. American economic review, 103(6): 2169-2195.
NOVY D, 2013. Gravity redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data[J]. Economic inquiry, 51(1): 101-121.
SILVA J S, TENREYRO S, 2006. The log of gravity[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 88(4): 641-658.
STONE S, MESSENT J, FLAIG D, 2015. Emerging policy issues: localisation barriers to trade[Z]. OECD trade policy papers No. 180.
SUN J, LUO Y T, ZHOU Y, 2022. The impact of regional trade agreements on the quality of export products in China's manufacturing industry[J]. Journal of Asian economics, 80(3): 101456.