碳足迹税、生态补偿与资源型经济产业转型

摘要碳足迹是从需求侧量化的产品内在的能耗所引发的碳排放,它对实现碳生态补偿和加强需求侧管理具有重要意义。通过核算能源消费的碳足迹并量化相应碳汇气体调节功能生态产品的价值,提出基于碳足迹税的生态价值补偿方案,创新了服务类生态产品价值实现机制。在此基础上,以山西省国家资源型经济转型综合配套改革试验区为例,构建CGE模型,分析碳足迹税对产业结构的影响,从要素密集度、投入产出和经济增长结构等方面比较分析资源型经济产业结构转型效应。研究发现:碳足迹对资源型经济转型具有积极作用,能够促进要素投入的集约化、资源配置的合理化和产业结构的高级化,实现资源密集型产业的减量化,推动技术密集型产业增长,有助于引导低能耗低排放的高新产业发展,在碳达峰、碳中和背景下具有一定的必要性和可行性。因此,我们建议通过碳足迹税引导产业结构的转型升级。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	熊振兴

关键词：碳足迹生态补偿产业转型资源型经济生态产品价值实现机制需求侧管理

Abstract： Carbon footprint quantifies the carbon emissions caused by the inherent energy consumption of products from the demand side, which is of great significance to achieve carbon ecological compensation and strengthen demand side management. By calculating the carbon footprint of energy consumption and quantifying the value of the corresponding carbon sequestration gas regulation function ecological products, this paper puts forward an ecological value compensation scheme based on carbon footprint tax, and innovates the value realization mechanism of service ecological products. On this basis, this paper, taking the comprehensive reform pilot area of national resource-based economic transformation in Shanxi Province as an example, constructs a CGE model to analyze the impact of carbon footprint tax on industrial structure, and compares and analyzes the effects of industrial structure transformation of resource-based economy from the aspects of factor intensity, input-output and economic growth structure. It is found that carbon footprint plays a positive role in the transformation of resource-based economy, which can promote the intensification of factor input, the rationalization of resource allocation and the upgrading of industrial structure, realize the reduction of resource-intensive industries, and promote the growth of technology-intensive industries. And it is also helpful to guide the development of high-tech industries with low energy consumption and low emissions, which is necessary and feasible under the background of carbon peak and carbon neutralization. Therefore, we propose to guide the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure through carbon footprint tax.

Keywords： Carbon Footprint Ecological Compensation Industrial Transformation Resource-Based Economy Ecological Product Value Realization Mechanism Demand-side Management

收稿日期 2021-06-28; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(21FJYB018);中国博士后科学基金项目(2018M641036)

作者简介: 熊振兴(1986— ),男,湖北随州人,博士,讲师,主要从事资源环境政策与公共经济管理研究。

引用本文:

熊振兴.碳足迹税、生态补偿与资源型经济产业转型[J]. 经济经纬, 2022,3: 89-96

XIONG Zhenxing.Carbon Footprint Tax, Ecological Value Compensation and Industrial Transformation of a Resource-Based Economy[J] Economic Survey, 2022,V39(3): 89-96

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I3/89

陈儒,姜志德,2018.中国省域低碳农业横向空间生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境(4):87-97.
樊鹏飞,梁流涛,许明军,等,2018.基于虚拟耕地流动视角的省际耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境(1):91-101.
方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等,2007.1981—2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学)(6):804-812.
干春晖,郑若谷,余典范,2011.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究(5):4-16.
郭克莎,2005.我国技术密集型产业发展的趋势、作用和战略[J].产业经济研究(5):1-12.
李东坤,邓敏,2016.中国省际OFDI、空间溢出与产业结构升级:基于空间面板杜宾模型的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题(1):121-133.
李颖,葛颜祥,刘爱华,等,2014.基于粮食作物碳汇功能的农业生态补偿机制研究[J].农业经济问题(10):33-40.
刘伟,张辉,2008.中国经济增长中的产业结构变迁和技术进步[J].经济研究(11):4-15.
卢俊宇,黄贤金,戴靓,等,2012.基于时空尺度的中国省级区域能源消费碳排放公平性分析[J].自然资源学报(12):2006-2017.
牛文元,2008.中国碳平衡交易框架研究[M].北京:科学出版社.
时佳瑞,汤铃,余乐安,等,2015.基于CGE模型的煤炭资源税改革影响研究[J].系统工程理论与实践(7):1698-1707.
万伦来,李浩,2020.生产性服务业集聚、产业结构升级与区域生态效率提升:来自2003—2016年中国30个省份的面板数据[J].经济经纬(2):97-105.
汪伟,刘玉飞,彭冬冬,2015.人口老龄化的产业结构升级效应研究[J].中国工业经济(11):47-61.
魏玮,张万里,2017.不同地区制造业集聚对效率的非线性影响研究[J].经济经纬(6):75-80.
吴立军,李文秀,2019.基于公平视角下的中国地区碳生态补偿研究[J].中国软科学(4):184-192.
毋晓蕾,汪应宏,陈常优,2014.耕地保护经济补偿标准测度研究:以河南省为例[J].经济经纬(6):19-23.
徐德云,2008.产业结构升级形态决定、测度的一个理论解释及验证[J].财政研究(1):46-49.
杨稣,刘德智,2011.生态补偿框架下碳平衡交易问题研究综述与分析[J].经济学动态(2):92-95.
原磊,王秀丽,2013.宏观政策取向对工业经济影响的模拟分析:基于动态CGE模型[J].中国工业经济(9):44-55.
曾以禹,吴柏海,周彩贤,等,2014.碳交易市场设计支持森林生态补偿研究[J].农业经济问题(6):67-76.
周昌林,魏建良,2007.产业结构水平测度模型与实证分析:以上海、深圳、宁波为例[J].上海经济研究(6):15-21.
周振华,1990.论现代经济增长与产业结构优化[J].财经研究(6):14-19.
ANTOSZEWSKI M,2019.Wide-range estimation of various substitution elasticities for CES production functions at the sectoral level [J].Energy economics,83:272-289.
BAO Q,TANG L,ZHANG Z,et al,2013.Impacts of border carbon adjustments on China's sectoral emissions:simulations with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model[J].China economic review,24:77-94.
CHOI T M,2013.Local sourcing and fashion quick response system: the impacts of carbon footprint tax[J].Transportation research part E:logistics and transportation review,55:43-54.
COSTANZA R,D'ARGE R,DE GROOT R,et al,1997.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].Nature,387:253-260.
FORERO-CANTOR G,RIBAL J,SANJUÁN N,2020.Levying carbon footprint taxes on animal-sourced foods:a case study in Spain [J].Journal of cleaner production,243:1-15.
GEMECHU E D,BUTNAR I,LLOP M,et al,2012.Environmental tax on products and services based on their carbon footprint: a case study of the pulp and paper sector [J].Energy policy,50:336-344.
MARTÍ J M C,TANCREZ J S,SEIFERT R W,2015.Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design [J].International journal of production economics,166:129-142.
MCAUSLAND C,NAJJAR N,2015.Carbon footprint taxes [J].Environmental and resource economics,61(1):37-70.
XIONG Z,LI H,2019.Ecological deficit tax:a tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China [J].Journal of cleaner production,230:1128-1137.