中国农业生态效率空间关联网络特征及其驱动因素研究

摘要基于1997—2018年中国31个省份的面板数据,运用窗口DEA模型测度各省份农业生态效率,利用社会网络和模体分析方法实证考察中国农业生态效率的空间关联特征,并通过二次指派模型对其驱动因素进行分析。研究发现:中国省际农业生态效率的空间关联具有明显的网络化特征,上海、天津、重庆等地在网络中居于核心位置,对我国农业生态效率的提升具有引领作用;块模型分析显示,四大板块的农业生态效率互动紧密,全国联动效应显著;模体分析结果显示,在中国农业生态效率空间关联网络中非均衡关联关系大量存在;QAP回归结果表明,相似的农业经济发展水平、农业市场化程度和农业技术水平有利于农业生态效率空间关联网络的形成,地理相邻对农业生态效率空间关联网络的形成具有显著促进作用。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郑云
	黄杰

关键词：农业生态效率空间关联社会网络分析

Abstract： Based on the panel data of 31 provinces in China from 1997 to 2018, this paper uses the window DEA model to measure the inter-provincial agricultural eco-efficiency, utilizes social network and module analysis methods to empirically investigate the spatial correlation characteristics of inter-provincial agricultural eco-efficiency, and analyzes its driving factors through the secondary assignment model. The study shows that the spatial correlation of inter-provincial agricultural eco-efficiency in China has obvious network characteristics. And Shanghai, Tianjin and Chongqing are in the core position in the network, which plays a leading role in the improvement of agricultural eco-efficiency. Block model analysis shows that the agricultural eco-efficiency of the four plates interact closely, with the feature of significant national linkage effect. The results of module analysis show that there are a large number of non-equilibrium associations in the spatial association network of agricultural ecological efficiency in China. The QAP regression results show that similar agricultural economic development level, agricultural marketization degree and agricultural technology innovation level are conducive to the formation of spatial correlation network of agricultural eco-efficiency.

Keywords： Agricultural Eco-efficiency Spatial Correlation Social Network Analysis

收稿日期 2021-05-27; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(16BJY037);河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划(人文社科)(2021-CX-054);河南省社会科学基金项目(2019CJJ083)

作者简介: 郑云(1972-),女,河南信阳人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事农业经济研究;黄杰(1987-),男,河南驻马店人,博士,副教授,主要从事资源环境经济研究。

引用本文:

郑云, 黄杰.中国农业生态效率空间关联网络特征及其驱动因素研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2021,6: 32-41

ZHENG Yun, HUANG Jie.A Study on the Characteristics and Driving Factors of Spatial Correlation Network of Agricultural Ecological Efficiency in China[J] Economic Survey, 2021,V38(6): 32-41

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V38/I6/32

[1] 曹俊文, 曾康. 2019. 低碳视角下长江经济带农业生态效率及影响因素研究[J]. 生态经济(8):115-119.
[2] 洪开荣, 陈诚, 丰超,等. 2016. 农业生态效率的时空差异及影响因素[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版) (2): 31-41.
[3] 侯孟阳, 姚顺波. 2019. 空间视角下中国农业生态效率的收敛性与分异特征[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境(4): 116-126.
[4] 赖斯芸, 杜鹏飞, 陈吉宁. 2004. 基于单元分析的非点源污染调查评估方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版) (9): 1184-1187.
[5] 李波, 张俊飚, 李海鹏,等. 2011. 中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境(8): 80-86.
[6] 李敬, 陈澍, 万广华,等. 2014. 中国区域经济增长的空间关联及其解释:基于网络分析方法[J]. 经济研究(11): 4-16.
[7] 刘军. 2004. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社.王宝义, 张卫国. 2018. 中国农业生态效率的省际差异和影响因素:基于1996~2015年31个省份的面板数据分析[J]. 中国农村经济(1): 46-62.
[8] 曾福生, 刘俊辉. 2019. 区域异质性下中国农业生态效率评价与空间差异实证:基于组合DEA与空间自相关分析[J]. 生态经济(3): 107-114.
[9] 郑德凤, 郝帅, 孙才志,等. 2018. 中国大陆生态效率时空演化分析及其趋势预测[J]. 地理研究(5): 1034-1046.
[10] BAEK E G, BROCK W A. 1992. A general test for nonlinear Granger causality: Bivariate model[Z].Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin at Madison Working Paper.
[11] BROCK W A, BAEK E G. 1991. Some theory of statistical inference for nonlinear science[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(4): 697-716.
[12] CHARNES A, COOPER W, LEWIN A Y, et al. 1994. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and application [M]. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[13] GRANGER C W J, NEWBOLD P. 1986. Forecasting economic time series (Second Edition) [M]. San Diego: Academic Press.
[14] HALKOS G E, TZEREMES N G. 2009. Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis [J]. Ecological Economics, 68(7): 2168-2176.
[15] HAN H, DING T, NIE L, et al. 2020. Agricultural eco-efficiency loss under technology heterogeneity given regional differences in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250(4): 19-51.
[16] HIEMSTRA C, JONES J D. 1994. Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation [J]. The Journal of Finance, 49(5): 1639-1664.
[17] HUPPES G, ISHIKAWA M. 2005. A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis[J]. Juornal of Industrial ecology, 9(4):25-41.
[18] LIU X, GUO P, GUO S. 2019. Assessing the eco-efficiency of a circular economy system in China's coal mining areas: Emergy and data envelopment analysis [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206: 1101-1109.
[19] NOTARNICOLA B, SALA S, ANTON A, et al. 2017. The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140: 399-409.
[20] OREA L, WALL A. 2017. A parametric approach to estimating eco-efficiency [J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3): 901-907.
[21] PICAZO-TADEO A J, BELTRN-ESTEVE M, GMEZ-LIMN J A.2012. Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(3): 798-809.
[22] PICAZO-TADEO A J, GMEZ-LIMN J A, REIG-MARTNEZ E. 2011.Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4): 1154-1164.
[23] SCOTT J. 2013. Social network analysis [M].London: Sage Publication.URDIALES M P, LANSINK A O, WALL A. 2016. Eco-efficiency among dairy farmers: The importance of socio-economic characteristics and farmer attitudes [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(4): 559-574.
[24] ZHANG X, CHENG X, YUAN J, et al. 2011. Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries [J]. Energy Policy, 39(2): 644-650.