财政科教支出与雾霾污染治理的空间关联效应

摘要基于财政科技支出和教育支出的视角,采用2004—2017年中国地级及以上城市的数据,通过空间面板模型实证检验了财政科教支出同雾霾污染治理之间的关系。研究结果表明:科技支出和教育支出能有效抑制雾霾污染,科技支出的效果要优于教育支出,且均存在一定的滞后效应。分区域检验结果显示:财政科教支出对雾霾污染治理的影响具有区域异质性,呈现由东至西依次减弱的效应。因此,现阶段要落实地方政府在环境保护方面的主体责任,充分发挥地方公共财政支出的作用。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	庞雨蒙
	刘震
	潘雨晨

关键词：财政科教支出环境治理雾霾污染

Abstract： The Nineteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China for the first time regards beautiful China as an important goal of building a strong socialist modernization country, and regards strengthening environmental protection as an opportunity and an important grasp to promote economic and social development and ecological environment protection. The governance of environmental pollution is closely related to the fiscal expenditure of local governments. Based on the perspective of fiscal technology and education expenditure, this paper empirically examines the relationship between fiscal technology and education expenditure and haze pollution by using the data of 273 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2004 to 2017 through the spatial panel model. The results show that fiscal technology expenditure and education expenditure are negatively correlated with haze pollution intensity, and the effect of technology research expenditure in haze treatment is better than that of education expenditure. The results of sub-regional show that the impact of fiscal technology and education expenditure on haze pollution has regional heterogeneity, showing a weakening situation from east to west. From the perspective of the whole country, there is a certain lag effect on the impact of fiscal technology expenditure and education expenditure on haze pollution. Therefore, the key point at this stage is implementing the main responsibility of local governments in environmental protection, giving full play to the role of local public fiscal expenditure.

Keywords： Fiscal Technology and Education Expenditure Environmental Governance Haze Pollution

收稿日期 2020-04-23; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(19CJY057);江苏省哲学社会科学基金项目(19EYC001)

作者简介: 庞雨蒙(1990— ),女,山东济南人,博士,讲师,主要从事财税政策研究;刘震(1989— ),女,山东聊城人,博士,讲师,主要从事贸易政策研究;潘雨晨(1990— ),男,山东济南人,博士(后),主要从事对外投资研究。

引用本文:

庞雨蒙, 刘震, 潘雨晨.财政科教支出与雾霾污染治理的空间关联效应[J]. 经济经纬, 2020,6: 128-138

PANG Yumeng, LIU Zhen, PAN Yuchen.Spatial Relevance Effect of Fiscal Technology and EducationExpenditure on Haze Pollution[J] Economic Survey, 2020,V37(6): 128-138

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V37/I6/128

卞元超,吴利华,白俊红.2020.财政科技支出竞争是否促进了区域创新绩效提升？——基于研发要素流动的视角[J].财政研究(1):45-58.
车德欣,吴传清,任晓怡,等.2020.财政科技支出如何影响企业技术创新?——异质性特征、宏微观机制与政府激励结构破解[J].中国软科学(3):171-182.
陈硕.2010.分税制改革、地方财政自主权与公共品供给[J].经济学(季刊) (4):1427-1446.
陈阳,逯进,于平.2019.技术创新减少环境污染了吗?——来自中国285个城市的经验证据[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版) (1):79-90.
冯海波,方元子.2014.地方财政支出的环境效应分析:来自中国城市的经验考察[J].财贸经济(2):30-43.
姜楠.2018.环保财政支出有助于实现经济和环境双赢吗?[J].中南财经政法大学学报(1):95-103.
卢洪友,杜亦譞,祁毓.2015.中国财政支出结构与消费型环境污染:理论模型与实证检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境(10):61-70.
逯进,陈阳,贺晓丽.2012.创新、经济增长与转型动力:基于山东省的实证分析[J].经济经纬(2):48-52.
马海涛,蔡杨,郝晓婧.2019.财政科技支出是否促进了中国工业企业创新? [J].经济与管理评论(5):43-57.
钱雪亚,缪仁余,胡博文.2014.教育投入的人力资本积累效率研究:基于随机前沿教育生产函数模型[J].中国人口科学(2):74-83.
邵帅,李欣,曹建华,等.2016.中国雾霾污染治理的经济政策选择:基于空间溢出效应的视角[J].经济研究(9):73-88.
田淑英,董玮,许文立.2016.环保财政支出、政府环境偏好与政策效应:基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J].经济问题探索(7):14-21.
王金波,佟继英.2018.财政科教支出、产业结构变迁与技术创新能力:基于供给侧改革视角下的审视[J].经济问题探索(3):18-31.
肖加元,刘潘.2018.财政支出对环境治理的门槛效应及检验:基于2003—2013年省际水环境治理面板数据[J].财贸研究(4):72-83.
谢荣辉.2017.环境规制、引致创新与中国工业绿色生产率提升[J].产业经济研究(2):42-52.
徐超,庞雨蒙,刘迪.2020.地方财政压力与政府支出效率:基于所得税分享改革的准自然实验分析[J].经济研究(6):138-154.
杨得前,刘仁济.2018.地方财政支出对要素禀赋结构升级的效应研究[J].当代财经(5):27-38.
杨省贵,顾新.2011.区域创新体系间创新要素流动研究[J].科技进步与对策(23):60-64.
夏梓耀.2018.论中央银行监管职能的分离与回归:以英国中央银行法制变迁为进路[J].河南财经政法大学学报(5):147-155.
臧传琴,陈蒙.2018.财政环境保护支出效应分析:基于2007—2015年中国30个省份的面板数据[J].财经科学(6):68-79.
张军,高远,傅勇,等.2007.中国为什么拥有了良好的基础设施?[J].经济研究(3):4-19.
周黎安.2007.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究 (7):36-50.
邹建军,刘金山.2020.财政科技支出能否提振企业全要素生产率?基于地方政府行为视角下的实证检验[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版) (3):92-104.
ARNOLD M.JAMES L S,ROBERT K.2011.Pace:Introduction to spatial econometrics[J].Statistical Papers,52(2):493-494.
BERNAUER T,KOUBI V.2006.States as providers of public goods:How does government size affect environmental quality? [Z].Available at SSRN 900487.
BOSETTI V,CARRARO C,GALEOTTI M.2006.A world induced technical change hybrid model[J].SSRN Energy Journal,27(2):12-43.
CARRION-FLORES C E,INNES R.2010.Environmental innovation and environmental performance[J].Journal of Environmental Economics &Management,59(1):27-42.
COLE M A,ELLIOTT R J R,SHANSHAN W U.2008.Industrial activity and the environment in China:An industry-level analysis[J].China Economic Review,19(3):400-408.
DASGUPTA S,HETTIGE H,WHEELER D.2000.What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry[J].Journal of Environmental Economics &Management,39(1):50-66.
DASGUPTA S,LAPLANTE B,MAMINGI N.2001.Inspections,pollution prices,and environmental performance:Evidence from China[J].Ecological Economics,36(3):487-498.
DOWLATABADI H,ORAVETZ M A.2006.US Long-term energy intensity:Backcast and projection[J].Energy Policy,34(17):3245-3256.
GERKMAN L.2012.Empirical spatial econometric modelling of small scale neighborhood[J].Journal of Geographical Systems,14(3):283-298.
GOETZ S J,DEBERTIN D L,PAGOULATOS A.1998.Human capital,income,and environmental quality:A state-level analysis[J].Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,27(2):200-208.
HALKOS G E,PAIZANOS,EPAMEINONDAS A.2013.The effect of government expenditure on the environment:An empirical investigation[J].Ecological Economics,91(1):48-56.
HUA Y,XIE R,SU Y.2018.Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities:Identifying composition and technique effects[J].China Economic Review,47(2):156-169.
HURWITZ J,LINES S,MONTGOMERY B.2002.The linkage between management practices,intangibles performance and stock returns[J].Journal of Intellectual Capital,3(1):51-61.
LAN J,MUNRO A.2013.Environmental compliance and human capital:Evidence from Chinese industrial firms[J].Resource and Energy Economics,35(4):534-557.
LOPEZ R,PALACIOS A.PALACIOS.2010.Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner?[Z].Working Papers 94795,University of Maryland.
LOPEZ R,GALINATO G I,ISLAM A.2011.Fiscal spending and the environment:Theory and empirics[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,62(2):180-198.