经济经纬
         首页        期刊介绍        编 委 会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        学术影响        广告合作        联系我们        留 言 板       
    经济经纬 2025 Issue (2) :3-15
    区域经济 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
    扁平化市域城镇空间结构促进城乡共同富裕的经验分析
李娜1, 赵康杰2, 景普秋2
1.山西财经大学 平台经济研究院, 山西 太原 030006;
2.山西财经大学 资源型经济转型发展研究院, 山西 太原 030006
    Empirical Analysis of Flattening Urban Spatial Structure to Promote Common Prosperity Between Urban and Rural Areas
    LI Na1, ZHAO Kangjie2, JING Puqiu2
1. Institute of Platform Economy, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Institute of Transition of Resource-based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
摘要
参考文献
相关文章
     Download: PDF (1387KB)   HTML 1KB   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 利用2017—2021年270个地级市的面板数据,分析了扁平化市域城镇空间结构对城乡共同富裕的影响效应及内在作用机制,并基于地理区位、经济发展水平、城市规模等级等地区属性多层次考察其适用性。结果表明:扁平化市域城镇空间结构能够有效提高城乡居民收入水平并缩小城乡收入差距,推动城乡共同富裕实现;机制方面,扁平化市域城镇空间结构对城乡共同富裕的影响主要通过提升乡村地区创业活跃度、加深乡村地区产业融合和扩大乡村地区市场范围三条路径进行有效传导,且乡村地区创业活跃度的中介效应>乡村地区市场规模的中介效应>乡村地区产业融合水平的中介效应;扁平化市域城镇空间结构对城乡共同富裕的作用效果在不同地区存在差异,西部和东北地区、经济发展水平较低地区、中小城市更能发挥扁平化市域城镇空间结构的城乡共同富裕效应。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李娜
赵康杰
景普秋
关键词城乡融合   城镇空间结构   城乡共同富裕   扁平化   市域   网络多中心度     
Abstract: Using panel data from 270 prefecture-level cities between 2017 and 2021, the paper analyzes the impact and intrinsic mechanisms of a flattened urban-rural spatial structure on common prosperity in urban and rural areas. It also examines the applicability of this structure based on multi-level regional attributes, including geographical location, economic development level and city size. The results show that flattening the urban spatial structure can effectively promote the increase of urban and rural residents’ income levels and narrow the urban-rural income gap and promote the realization of common prosperity between urban and rural areas. Mechanism analysis reveals that the impact of a flattened urban-rural spatial structure on common prosperity between urban and rural areas is primarily transmitted through three effective pathways: enhancing entrepreneurial activity in rural areas, deepening rural industrial integration and expanding the market scope in rural areas. Specifically, the intermediary effects are ranked as follows: entrepreneurial activity in rural areas > market size in rural areas > industrial integration level in rural areas. Moreover, the effect of a flattened urban-rural spatial structure on urban-rural common prosperity varies across different regions. The western and northeastern regions, areas with lower levels of economic development, and small- and medium-sized cities are found to better leverage the common prosperity effect of a flattened urban-rural spatial structure.
KeywordsUrban-rural Integration   Urban Spatial Structure   Urban and Rural Common Prosperity   Flattening   Urban Area   Network Multi-centricity     
收稿日期 2024-08-11; 接受日期 ;
基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(22BJL028)
通讯作者 李娜(1996— ),女,山西泽州人,博士,讲师,主要从事区域创新与区域经济发展研究。   
作者简介: 赵康杰(1983— ),男,山西运城人,博士,教授,主要从事城市与区域发展研究;景普秋(1970— ),女,山西临猗人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事城市与区域发展研究。
引用本文:   
李娜, 赵康杰, 景普秋.扁平化市域城镇空间结构促进城乡共同富裕的经验分析[J].  经济经纬, 2025,2: 3-15
LI Na, ZHAO Kangjie, JING Puqiu.Empirical Analysis of Flattening Urban Spatial Structure to Promote Common Prosperity Between Urban and Rural Areas[J]  Economic Survey, 2025,V42(2): 3-15
链接本文:  
http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/     或     http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V42/I2/3
Copyright 2012 by 经济经纬