资源拼凑视角下创业团队创造力的形成机制研究

摘要基于资源拼凑理论的视角,利用河南郑州地区76个创业企业团队的调研数据,分别检验了创业拼凑在组织信任、经验学习和创业团队创造力之间的链接作用以及组织信任、经验学习在创业拼凑中介机制形成过程中的相互调节作用。研究发现:(1)组织信任、经验学习会对创业拼凑产生积极作用;(2)创业拼凑对团队创造力会产生重要影响,并且在组织信任、经验学习对团队创造力的影响过程中起中介作用;(3)经验学习对组织信任与创业拼凑之间的关系具有显著的调节作用,并正向调节组织信任经由创业拼凑对团队创造力的间接影响;(4)组织信任对经验学习与创业拼凑之间的关系具有显著的调节作用,并正向调节经验学习经由创业拼凑对团队创造力的间接影响。研究结论丰富了资源拼凑视角下创业团队创造力形成机制的研究,为探索资源拼凑理论的解释边界条件提供了思路,对创业团队及企业的健康成长具有一定的理论和现实意义。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈冲
	杨自伟
	余彩婷

关键词：组织信任经验学习创业拼凑团队创造力

Abstract： Based on the resource bricolage theory, the study uses 76 entrepreneurial teams from Zhengzhou, Henan Province to test the antecedent of the entrepreneurial bricolage and its impact on the team creativity and the mutually moderated effect between organizational trust and experiential learning. There are following findings: (1) Organizational trust and experiential learning have a positive effect on entrepreneurial bricolage; (2) Entrepreneurial bricolage plays a positive mediating role in the process of the impact of organizational trust and experiential learning on team creativity; (3) Experiential learning has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between organizational trust and entrepreneurial bricolage, and positively moderates the indirect influence of organizational trust on team creativity through entrepreneurial bricolage; (4) Organizational trust has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between experiential learning and entrepreneurial bricolage, and positively moderates the indirect influence of experiential learning on team creativity through entrepreneurial bricolage. The conclusion enriches the research on the formation mechanism of entrepreneurial team creativity from the perspective of resource patchwork, provides ideas for exploring the explanatory boundary conditions of resource bricolage theory, and has certain theoretical and practical significance for the healthy growth of entrepreneurial teams and enterprises.

Keywords： Organizational Trust Experiential Learning Entrepreneurial Bricolage Team Creativity

收稿日期 2022-10-20; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BGL133);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2021BJJ010);河南省软科学研究计划项目(232400410156);河南省高校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目(2023-JCZD-20);河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2022-ZZJH-023);河南财经政法大学青年拔尖人才资助计划

通讯作者 杨自伟(1978— ),男,河南郏县人,博士,讲师,主要从事领导力与组织行为研究。

作者简介: 陈冲(1981— ),男,河南滑县人,博士,副教授,主要从事创新创业、领导力与人力资源管理研究;余彩婷(1994— ),女,河南汝州人,博士研究生,主要从事领导力与组织行为研究。

引用本文:

陈冲, 杨自伟, 余彩婷.资源拼凑视角下创业团队创造力的形成机制研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2023,3: 118-127

CHEN Chong, YANG Ziwei, YU Caiting.A Study on the Formation Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Team Creativity Based on the Perspective of Resource Bricolage[J] Economic Survey, 2023,V40(3): 118-127

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V40/I3/118

陈彪,蔡莉,陈琛,等,2014. 新企业创业学习方式研究:基于中国高技术企业的多案例分析 [J]. 科学学研究(3): 392-399.
邓巍,梁巧转,范培华,2018. 创业拼凑研究脉络梳理与未来展望 [J]. 研究与发展管理(3): 145-156.
贺丹君,卞桂平,2021.信息技术的社会公共信任建设价值 [J]. 江西社会科学(11): 25-34.
林琳,陈万明,2018. 互联网情境下创业企业创新绩效影响因素研究 [J]. 经济经纬(3): 110-116.
刘人怀,王娅男,2017. 创业拼凑对创业学习的影响研究:基于创业导向的调节作用 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理(10): 135-146.
鲁喜凤,单标安,李扬,等,2019. 创始人的探索激情,行动学习与新企业资源拼凑 [J]. 管理学报(8): 1197-1203.
单标安,蔡莉,鲁喜凤,等,2014. 创业学习的内涵、维度及其测量[J]. 科学学研究(12): 1867-1875.
孙美佳,崔勋,2013. 组织公平与组织信任的文化特质性及其对中国企业凝聚力形成的影响 [J]. 管理学报(10): 1462-1469.
覃亚洲,谢玉华,2022.企业伪善情境下员工创造力研究:基于道德认知和情感的双路径机制[J].企业经济(10):27-36.
汤淑琴,蔡莉,陈娟艺,等,2015. 经验学习对新企业绩效的动态影响研究 [J]. 管理学报(8): 1154-1162.
徐莉莉,2009. 基于六类型信任模型的中国企业不信任问题应对策略研究 [J]. 经济经纬(1): 100-103.
于晓宇,李雅洁,陶向明,2017. 创业拼凑研究综述与未来展望 [J]. 管理学报(2): 306-316.
郑晓涛,柯江林,石金涛,等,2008. 中国背景下员工沉默的测量以及信任对其的影响[J]. 心理学报(2): 219-227.
ANDERSON N, POTOCNIK K, ZHOU J, 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a State-of-the-Science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework [J]. Journal of management,40(5): 1297-1333.
BAAS M, DE DREU C K, NIJSTAD B A, 2008. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? [J]. Psychological bulletin,134(6): 779-806.
BAKER T, NELSON R E, 2005. Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage [J]. Administrative science quarterly,50(3): 329-366.
BHAGAVATULA S, ELFRING T, VAN TILBURG A, et al, 2010. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry [J]. Journal of business venturing,25(3): 245-260.
COSTA A C, 2003. Work team trust and effectiveness [J]. Personnel review,32(5): 605-622.
DREU C K D, WEST M A, 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making [J]. Journal of applied psychology,86(6): 1191-1201.
FERNELEY E, BELL F, 2006. Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs [J]. Technovation,26(2): 232-241.
FISHER G, 2012. Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research [J]. Entrepreneurship theory & practice,36(5): 1019-1051.
GILSON L L, SHALLEY C E, 2004. A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams' engagement in creative processes [J]. Journal of management,30(4): 453-470.
GUNDRY L K, KICKUL J R, GRIFFITHS M D, et al, 2011. Entrepreneurial bricolage and innovation ecology: precursors to social innovation? [J]. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research,31(19): 659-673.
LI G, LIU H, LUO Y, 2018. Directive versus participative leadership: Dispositional antecedents and team consequences[J]. Journal of occupational and organizationalpsychology, 91(3): 645-664.
PREACHER K J, HAYES A F, 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models [J]. Behavior research methods,40(3): 879-891.
RUEF M, ALDRICH H E, CARTER N M, 2003. The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs [J]. American sociological review,68(2): 195-222.
SCHOORMAN F D, MAYER R C, DAVIS J H, 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future [J]. Academy of management review,32(2): 344-354.
SENYARD J, BAKER T, STEFFENS P, et al, 2014. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms [J]. Journal of product innovation management,31(2): 211-230.
SENYARD J M, BAKER T, DAVIDSSON P, 2009. Entrepreneurial bricolage: Towards systematic empirical testing[J]. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 29(5):1-14.
SHIN S J, KIM T, LEE J, et al, 2012. Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: a cross-level interaction [J]. Academy of management journal,55(1): 197-212.
SIRMON D G, HITT M A, IRELAND R D, et al, 2011. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage [J]. Journal of management,37(5): 1390-1412.
STINGLHAMBER F, CREMER D D, MERCKEN L, 2006. Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: a multiple foci approach [J]. Group & organization management,31(4): 442-468.
VAN DE WALLE S, 2014. Building resilience in public organizations: the role of waste and bricolage [J]. The innovation journal,19(2): 2-18.
YU X, LI Y, SU Z, et al, 2020. Entrepreneurial bricolage and its effects on new venture growth and adaptiveness in an emerging economy [J]. Asia pacific journal of management,37(4): 1141-1163.
ZHANG J, 2011. The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs [J]. Small business economics,36(2): 187-208.