开放悖论、主导设计情景与双元创新绩效

摘要开放式创新和独占机制是解决双元创新资源张力的重要途径。以1991—2020年中国上市公司的专利申请数据为样本,研究开放悖论下开放与独占对双元创新绩效的影响,并实证检验不同主导设计情景下开放与独占对双元创新绩效影响的异质性。研究发现:首先,利用式创新绩效对开放度和独占度的敏感性高于探索式创新绩效;其次,开放广度对双元创新绩效呈倒U形影响,开放深度有助于提高探索式创新绩效,但对利用式创新绩效的影响分布于倒U形曲线的左支;再次,独占度先抑制双元创新绩效达到一定的保护程度后促进双元创新绩效;最后,在不同的主导设计情景下,开放悖论各元素对探索式创新绩效的影响不存在显著差异,对利用式创新绩效影响差异显著。研究结论有助于丰富现有开放悖论和双元创新理论方面的文献,为主导设计情景下的双元创新战略的不同侧重提供经验证据,也为不同战略下开放和独占策略的选择提供理论支持和决策参考。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蔡双立
	马洪梅

关键词：开放式创新独占机制开放悖论主导设计双元创新绩效

Abstract： Open innovation andappropriability mechanism are important ways to solve the resource tension of ambidextrousinnovation.Base on the patent data of the listed companies from 1991 to 2020,this paper studies the impact of openness and monopoly on ambidextrous innovation performance under the opening paradox, and empirically tests the heterogeneity of the impact of openness and appropriability on ambidextrous innovation performance under different dominant design scenarios.Firstly, the sensitivity of exploitative innovation performance to openness and exclusivity is higher than that of exploratory innovation performance. Secondly, the breadth of openness has an inverted U-shaped impact on ambidextrous innovation performance, and the depth of openness has a positive influence on exploitative innovation within the range, but the influence on the performance of utilization innovation is distributed in the left branch of the inverted U-shaped curve.Thirdly, appropriate first suppresses ambidextrous innovation performanceto a certain degree of protection can promotes the performance of ambidextrous innovation.Finally, under different dominant design scenarios, the influence of each element of open paradox on exploratory innovation performance is not significant, but on utilization innovation performance is significant.The conclusions help to enrich the existing literature on open paradox and ambidextrous innovation theory, and provide empirical evidence for the different emphasis of ambidextrousinnovation strategy under the dominant design situation. It also provides theoretical support and decision-making reference for the choice of open and exclusive strategies under different strategies.

Keywords： Open Innovation Appropriability Mechanism Open Paradox Dominant Design Ambidextrous Innovation Performance

收稿日期 2022-05-23; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(20BGL051)

通讯作者 马洪梅(1981— ),女,河北衡水人,南开大学博士研究生,衡水学院讲师,主要从事战略管理研究。

作者简介: 蔡双立(1963— ),男,河南洛阳人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事战略管理和知识产权研究。

引用本文:

蔡双立, 马洪梅.开放悖论、主导设计情景与双元创新绩效[J]. 经济经纬, 2022,6: 98-107

CAI Shuangli, MA Hongmei.Open Paradox, Dominant Design Scenario and Ambidextrous Innovation Performance[J] Economic Survey, 2022,V39(6): 98-107

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I6/98

蔡双立,徐珊珊,许思宁,2020.开放式创新与知识产权保护:悖论情景下的战略决策逻辑与模式匹配[J].现代财经(3):3-18.
蔡双立,冯强,武振楠,2018.技术体制动态演变与知识产权开发模式匹配:一个理论分析框架[J].现代财经(4):75-85.
陈立勇,刘梅,曾德明,等,2016.协作研发网络成员间重复合作对二元式创新的影响:技术能力与环境动态性的调节作用[J].科技管理研究(17):5.
陈钰芬,陈劲,2008.开放度对企业技术创新绩效的影响[J].科学学研究(2):419-426.
段庆锋,2019.社会资本对专利合作二元关系的影响:吸收能力、保护强度的调节效应[J].科技进步与对策(5):11-17.
甘静娴,戚湧,2018.双元创新、知识场活性与知识产权能力的路径分析[J].科学学研究(11):2078-2091.
姜李丹,薛澜,梁正,2020.技术创新网络强弱关系影响效应的差异化:研究综述与展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理(5):42-53.
吕一博,朱雨晴,鲍丽宁,2020.内向型开放式创新与突破性创新绩效:网络位置的调节效应[J].管理科学(5):860.
刘志迎,支援援,吴瑞瑞,2021.开放获取资源能够促进二元创新吗？[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版)(1):24-33.
施萧萧,张庆普,2017.组织惯性对企业渐进性创新能力影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理(11):1015.
王建平,2020.中国制造企业网络关系异质性和稳定性对探索式创新的影响:知识冗余的调节效应[J].科研管理(11):90-99.
徐露允,曾德明,李健,2017.知识网络中心势、知识多元化对企业二元式创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报(2):221-228.
杨博旭,王玉荣,李兴光,2019.“厚此薄彼”还是“雨露均沾”:组织如何有效利用网络嵌入资源提高创新绩效[J].南开管理评论(3):201-213.
张敬文,王丹,于深,2020.联盟组合开放度、非正式独占性机制与开放式创新绩效:基于战略性新兴产业数据的实证分析[J].宏观经济研究,(1):69-80.
张娴,方曙,2016.专利引用网络主路径方法研究述评与展望[J].图书情报工作(20):140-148.
张振刚,王华岭,陈志明,等,2017.企业内向型开放式创新对根本性创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报(10):1465-1474.
郑雅君,崔永梅,2021.基于并购的开放式创新与高管薪酬契约研究[J].经济经纬(5):910.
BREM A,NYLUND P A,SCHUSTER G,2016.Innovation and de facto standardization:the influence of dominant design on innovative performance,radical innovation and process innovation[J].Technovation,50:79-88.
CHENG C C,YANG C,SHEU C,2016.Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: an empirical study[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,41:79-91.
GUAN J,LIU N,2016.Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: a patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J].Research policy,45(1):972.
HITCHEN E L,NYLUND P A, VIARDOT E,2017.The effectiveness of open innovation:do size and performance of open innovation groups matter?[J].International journal of innovation management,21(3):1-24.
LAURSEN K,SALTER A J,2014.The paradox of openness:appropriability,external search and collaboration[J].Research policy,43(5):867-878.
QUINTANA-GARCíA C,BENAVIDES-VELASCO C A,2008.Innovative competence,exploration and exploitation:the influence of technological diversification[J].Research policy,37(3):492-507.
RITALA P,HUSTED K,OLANDER H,et al,2018.External knowledge sharing and radical innovation:the downsides of uncontrolled openness[J].Journal of knowledge management,22(5):110423.
SEBASTIAN K,JUTTA S W,WELPE I M,2018.More is not always better:effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level[J].Research policy,48(1):1.