Production Service Industry Agglomeration, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Regional Ecological Efficiency Improvement——Based on Panel Data of 30 Provinces in Mainland China from 2003 to 2016
WAN Lunlai, LI Hao
School of Economics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Abstract：
Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in mainland China from 2003 to 2016, and from the perspective of regions and five major types of producer services, by adopting mediating effect test method, this paper studies the mediating effect of industrial structure upgrading in the process of promoting regional ecological efficiency through producer services agglomeration. The results show that: the upgrading of industrial structure plays a part of intermediary role in the overall agglomeration of productive services to promote regional ecological efficiency. Among them, the intermediary effect is significant in transportation, storage and postal industry, information transmission, computer services and software industry, and financial industry. In the economically developed eastern region, the upgrading of industrial structure plays a complete intermediary role in the process of promoting regional ecological efficiency by three types of agglomeration: transportation, storage and postal industry, information transmission, computer services and software industry, and financial industry; in the economically underdeveloped central and western regions, the upgrading of industrial structure fails to play a positive intermediary role, which has a masking effect in the process of three types of agglomeration, namely, transportation, storage and postal industry, information transmission, computer services and software industries, as well as scientific research and technology services, to promote the improvement of regional ecological efficiency.
WAN Lunlai, LI Hao.Production Service Industry Agglomeration, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Regional Ecological Efficiency Improvement——Based on Panel Data of 30 Provinces in Mainland China from 2003 to 2016[J] Economic Survey, 2020,V37(2): 97-105
陈真玲.2016.基于超效率DEA模型的中国区域生态效率动态演化研究[J].经济经纬(6):31-35. 邓向荣,刘文强.2013.金融集聚对产业结构升级作用的实证分析[J].南京社会科学(10):5-20. 韩永辉,黄亮雄,王贤彬.2016.产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J].数量经济技术经济研究(4):40-59. 李姝.2011.城市化、产业结构调整与环境污染[J].财经问题研究(6):38-43. 刘胜,顾乃华.2014.行政垄断、生产性服务业集聚与城市工业污染:来自260个地级及以上城市的经验证据[J].财经研究(11):95-107. 毛德凤,彭飞,刘华.2016.城市扩张、财政分权与环境污染:基于263个地级市面板数据的实证分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报(5):42-53. 盛丰.2014.生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级:机制与经验:来自230个城市数据的空间计量分析[J].产业经济研究(2):32-39. 温忠麟,叶宝娟.2014.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展(5):731-745. 王志祥,张洪振,龚新蜀,等.2018.物流产业集聚、市场分割与区域绿色经济效率[J].经济经纬(5):87-93. 武建新,胡建辉.2018.环境规制、产业结构调整与绿色经济增长:基于中国省级面板数据的实证检验[J].经济问题探索(3):7-17. 许梦博,王明赫,翁钰栋.2018.生产性服务业集聚有利于高技术产业的研发效率吗?[J].经济问题探索(2):135-141. 杨浩昌,李廉水,刘军.2018.产业聚集与中国城市全要素生产率[J].科研管理(1):83-94. 于斌斌.2017.生产性服务业集聚能提高制造业生产率吗?:基于行业、地区和城市异质性视角的分析[J].南开经济研究(2):112-132. ANDERSEN P, PETERSEN N C. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science,39(10): 1261-1264. COFFER J. 2000. The geographies of producer services[J]. Urban Geography, 21(2): 170-183.
2020 
