经济经纬
         首页        期刊介绍        编 委 会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        学术影响        广告合作        联系我们        留 言 板       
    经济经纬 2011 Issue (3) :156-160
    经济法 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
    社会保障权司法救济机制研究
    付龙飞 1,2
    (1.中南大学 法学院,湖南 长沙 410083 ;2.河南财经政法大学 法学院,河南 郑州 450002)
    A Research into the Judicial Remedy Mechanism of the Right to Social Security
    FU Long-fei
    (1.Law School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China|2.Law School, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
摘要
参考文献
相关文章
     Download: PDF (821KB)   HTML 1KB   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 社会保障权是现代社会公民的基本人权,其蕴涵着人的生存和人的尊严的基本需要。社会保障权易受到私权利和公权力侵害,社会保障权司法救济机制的选择和构建依赖于社会保障权的法律内涵和特征。作为现代公民的社会权和宪法权利,社会保障权具有法律强制性、主体多元性、关系复合性、公益性和可诉性的特点。我国社会保障权司法救济主要是通过“双轨制”来实现的,即民事程序和行政程序。但这两种模式与相关保障制度的缺失和不足影响到社会保障权利的救济,有必要在现有的法律框架内通过改造行政复议程序和仲裁程序、建立专门的社会保障法庭、确立公益诉讼制度和完善相关的司法救助与法律责任制度来构建我国社会保障权的救济机制,充分保障公民社会保障权的实现。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
付龙飞
关键词社会保障权   救济机制   民事程序   行政程序     
Abstract: The right to social security is the basic human right of modern citizens, which contains basic needs of a person’s survival and human dignity. The right to social security is vulnerable to the infringement of privacy right and public power and the choice and construction of its judicial remedy mechanism depend on the legal contents and characteristics of the right to social security. As the social right and constitutional right of modern citizens, the right to social security has the properties of legal compulsion, pluralistic subjects, compound relationships, public welfare and actionability. The judicial implementation relies on “dual system”, namely, civil procedure and administrative procedure. But the deficiency of the two models and relevant security systems affects the remedy of social security right. It is necessary to construct our country’s social security right remedy mechanism in the existing legal framework and fully safeguard citizens’ social security rights by transforming the administrative review procedure and arbitration procedure, establishing a dedicated social security court, establishing public interest litigation system and perfecting relevant judicial assistance system and legal responsibility system
Keywordsthe right to social security   remedy mechanism   civil procedure   administrative procedure     
收稿日期 2010-01-25; 接受日期 2011-10-30;
作者简介: 付龙飞(1971-),男 ,河南信阳人, 中南大学博士研究生, 河南财经政法大学法学院副教授,主要从事经济法和社会保障法研究。
引用本文:   
付龙飞.社会保障权司法救济机制研究[J].  经济经纬, 2011,3: 156-160
FU Long-fei.A Research into the Judicial Remedy Mechanism of the Right to Social Security[J]  Economic Survey, 2011,V28(3): 156-160
链接本文:  
http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/     或     http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2011/V28/I3/156
Copyright 2012 by 经济经纬