新一轮农地确权对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响研究——基于对耕地感知价值的中介效应检验

摘要从新一轮农地确权颁证切入,考虑确权颁证政策对农户耕地价值感知影响的异质性,进而采用中介效应模型分析验证了确权颁证对农户耕地质量保护行为的促进作用。研究表明:确权颁证加强了农户对地权安全性与稳定性的感知,有效促进了农户在土壤有机质提升和小型农田基础设施建设上的保护性投资;伴随农地确权颁证政策的实施,农户所感知耕地价值的综合得分由高到低依次为社会感知、权属感知和经济感知,且权属和社会感知价值在确权颁证对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响中具有显著的中介效应,而经济感知价值未被证明具有中介作用;若忽视耕地感知价值的影响,新一轮确权颁证对农户耕地质量保护行为的促进作用会被高估;进一步的稳健性检验表明,是否进行土地流转对农户耕地价值感知的影响存在异质性,在只经营自家承包地的农户中,确权颁证对耕地质量保护行为的总效应得到强化。因此,政府应积极巩固确权颁证成果,通过提升农户耕地感知价值来提高其耕地质量保护行为的自觉性。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张改清
	张建杰

关键词：农地确权颁证权属感知价值社会感知价值经济感知价值耕地质量保护

Abstract： Starting from the new round of farmland confirmation certification, this paper considers the heterogeneity of the impact of confirmation policy on farmers’ perception of cultivated land value, and then uses the intermediary effect model to analyze and verify the effect of confirmation certification on farmers’ cultivated land quality protection behavior. The are following results: The confirmation certification strengthens farmers’ perception of the security and stability of land rights, and effectively promotes farmers’ protective investment in the promotion of soil organic matter and the construction of small-scale farmland infrastructure. With the implementation of the farmland confirmation certification policy, the comprehensive scores of farmers’ perceived cultivated land value from high to low are social perception, ownership perception and economic perception. And ownership and social perceived value have a significant intermediary effect on farmers’ cultivated land quality protection behavior, while economic perceived value has not been proved to play an intermediary role; If the influence of the perceived value of cultivated land is ignored, the effect of a new round of confirmation of rights on farmers’ cultivated land quality protection behavior will be overestimated. Further robustness test shows that the impact of land transfer on farmers’ perception of cultivated land value is heterogeneous. Among farmers who only manage their own contracted land, the total effect of confirming certification on cultivated land quality protection behavior is strengthened. Therefore, the government should actively consolidate the results of confirmation and certification, and improve the consciousness of farmers’ cultivated land quality protection behavior by enhancing the perceived value of cultivated land.

Keywords： Farmland Rights Certification Ownership Perceived Value Socially Perceived Value Economic Perceived Value Cultivated Land Quality Protection

收稿日期 2022-11-08; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(21BJY186);河南省软科学研究计划项目(222400410110)

通讯作者 张建杰(1969— ),男,山西五台人,博士,教授,主要从事农业技术经济研究。

作者简介: 张改清(1970— ),女,山西盂县人,博士,教授,主要从事农户经济与生态经济研究。

引用本文:

张改清, 张建杰.新一轮农地确权对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响研究——基于对耕地感知价值的中介效应检验[J]. 经济经纬, 2023,4: 48-57

ZHANG Gaiqing, ZHANG Jianjie.A Study on the Impact of the New Round of Farmland Ownership Confirmation on Farmers’ Behavior of Protecting the Quality of Cultivated Land: Test of Intermediary Effect Based on the Perceived Value of Cultivated Land[J] Economic Survey, 2023,V40(4): 48-57

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V40/I4/48

曹慧,赵凯,2019.耕地经营规模对农户亲环境行为的影响[J].资源科学 (4):740-752.
程令国,张晔,刘志彪,2016.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J].管理世界 (1):88-98.
高强,孔祥智,2019.新中国70年的农村产权制度:演进脉络与改革思路[J].理论探索 (6):99-107.
高叙文,方师乐,史新杰,等,2021.农地产权稳定性与农地生产率:基于新一轮农地确权的研究[J].中国农村经济 (10):24-43.
盖豪,颜廷武,张俊飚,2020.感知价值、政府规制与农户秸秆机械化持续还田行为:基于冀、皖、鄂三省1288份农户调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济 (8):106-123.
洪炜杰,罗必良,2018.地权稳定能激励农户对农地的长期投资吗[J].学术研究 (9):78-86,177.
胡新艳,陈小知,王梦婷,2017.农地确权如何影响投资激励[J].财贸研究 (12):72-81.
黄季焜,冀县卿,2012.农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J].管理世界 (9):76-81,99,187-188.
黄晓慧,王礼力,陆迁,2019.农户水土保持技术采用行为研究:基于黄土高原1152户农户的调查数据[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版) (2):133-141.
李博,王瑞梅,卢泉,2022.经营权不稳定是否阻碍了农户耕地质量保护投资[J].农业技术经济 (5):105-116.
李哲,李梦娜,2018.新一轮农地确权影响农户收入吗?——基于CHARLS的实证分析[J].经济问题探索 (8):182-190.
李成龙,周宏,2020.农户会关心租来的土地吗？——农地流转与耕地保护行为研究[J].农村经济 (6):33-39.
李星光,刘军弟,霍学喜,2019.新一轮农地确权对农户生计策略选择的影响:以苹果种植户为例[J].资源科学(10):1923-1934.
刘淑云,韩家彬,刘玉丰,2021.农地确权对农户耕地质量保护投资的影响研究[J].农业经济与管理 (6):20-29.
龙云,任力,2017.农地流转制度对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响:基于湖南省田野调查的实证研究[J].资源科学 (11):2094-2103.
卢华,周应恒,2021.效益预期对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响研究:来自江苏的经验证据[J].江西财经大学学报 (2):80-92.
钱龙,冯永辉,陆华良,等,2019.产权安全性感知对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响:以广西为例[J].中国土地科学 (10):93-101.
钱龙,冯永辉,钱文荣,2021.农地确权、调整经历与农户耕地质量保护行为:来自广西的经验证据[J].农业技术经济 (1):61-76.
钱龙,缪书超,陆华良,2020.新一轮确权对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响:来自广西的经验证据[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版) (1):28-37,162-163.
钱忠好,冀县卿,2016.中国农地流转现状及其政策改进:基于江苏、广西、湖北、黑龙四省(区)调查数据的分析[J].管理世界 (2):71-81.
仇焕广,刘乐,李登旺,等,2017.经营规模、地权稳定性与土地生产率:基于全国4省地块层面调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济 (6):30-43.
宋才发,2017.农村集体土地确权登记颁证的法治问题探讨[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)(1):100-105.
王淇韬,郭翔宇,2020.感知利益、社会网络与农户耕地质量保护行为:基于河南省滑县410个粮食种植户调查数据[J].中国土地科学 (7):43-51.
温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等,2004.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报 (5):614-620.
吴璟,王天宇,王征兵,2021.社会网络和感知价值对农户耕地质量保护行为选择的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)(6):138-147.
吴璟,昝梦莹,王征兵,2020.感知价值对农户参与耕地质量保护意愿的影响:以陕西省为例[J].中国土地科学 (6):66-74.
徐志刚,崔美龄,2021a.农地产权稳定一定会增加农户农业长期投资吗？——基于合约约束力的视角[J].中国农村观察 (2):42-60.
徐志刚,高群,刘静,等,2021b.农地确权影响的再审视:理论逻辑与经验证据[J].农业经济与管理 (2):63-76.
应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等,2018.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资:基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察 (3):110-127.
臧俊梅,郑捷航,农殷璇,等,2020.耕地保护及其必要性:不同兼业程度农户的认知与意愿[J].中国农业资源与区划 (2):82-90.
张童朝,颜廷武,何可,等,2017.资本禀赋对农户绿色生产投资意愿的影响:以秸秆还田为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境 (8):78-89.
赵向豪,陈彤,姚娟,2018.认知视角下农户安全农产品生产意愿的形成机理及实证检验:基于计划行为理论的分析框架[J].农村经济 (11):23-29.
郑沃林,罗必良,2019.农地确权颁证对农地抛荒的影响:基于产权激励的视角[J].上海财经大学学报 (4):90-99.
郑志浩,高杨,2017.中央“不得调地”政策:农民的态度与村庄的土地调整决策[J].中国农村观察 (4):72-86.
钟甫宁,纪月清,2009.土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J].经济研究 (12):43-51.
周南,许玉韫,刘俊杰,等,2019.农地确权、农地抵押与农户信贷可得性:来自农村改革试验区准实验的研究[J].中国农村经济 (11):51-68.
ABDULAI A,OWUSU V,GOETZ G,2011.Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures:theoretical and empirical analyses[J].Journal of development economics,96(1):66-78.
BARDHAN P,MOOKHERJEE D,2011.Subsidized farm input programs and agricultural performance:a farm-level analysis of West Bengal’s Green Revolution,1982—1995[J].American economic journal:applied economics,3(4):186-214.
DEININGER K,JIN S,2005.Tenure security and land-related investment:evidence from Ethiopia[J].European economic review,50(5):1245-1277.
FEDER G,ONCHAN T,1987.Land ownership security and farm investment in Thailand[J].American journal of agricultural economics,69(2):311-320.
FORT R,2008.The homogenization effect of land titling on investment incentives:evidence from Peru[J].NJAS-wageningen journal of life sciences,55(4):325-343.
GELDER J L,LUCIANO E C,2015.Tenure security as a predictor of housing investment in low-income settlements:testing a tripartite model[J].Environment and planning A,47(2):485-500.
GHEBRU H,HOLDEN S T,2015.Technical efficiency and productivity differential effects of land right certification:a quasi-experimental evidence[J].Quarterly journal of international agriculture,54(1):1-31.
HOLDEN S T,DEININGER K,GHEBRU H,2009.Impacts of low-cost land certification on investment and productivity[J].American journal of agricultural economics,91(2):359-373.
LOVO S,2016.Tenure insecurity and investment in soil conservation:evidence from Malawi[J].World development,78:219-229.
MARKUS G,HOUNGBEDJI K,KONDYLIS F,2018.Formalization without certification? Experimental evidence on property rights and investment [J].Journal of development economics,132:57-74.
REN H,ZHU G,HEERINK X,et al,2019.Perceptions of land tenure security in rural China:the impact of land reallocation and certification[J].Society ＆ natural resources,32(12):1399-1415.