领导授权如何激发员工创造力——基于积极情绪的调节作用

摘要基于社会交换理论,以团队心理安全感知为中介机制,以积极情绪为调节机制,构建了领导授权对员工创造力的影响及传导机制,通过两阶段收集到的243份数据对研究假设进行了验证。研究结果显示:(1)领导授权正向影响团队心理安全感知和员工创造力;(2)领导授权通过团队心理安全感知间接影响员工创造力;(3)员工积极情绪调节团队心理安全感知与员工创造力间的关系,即当员工积极情绪较高时,团队心理安全感知对员工创造力的正向影响更强;(4)员工积极情绪调节领导授权通过团队心理安全感知对员工创造力的间接效应,即当员工积极情绪水平较高时,领导授权通过团队心理安全感知对员工创造力的正向效应会被增强。研究深入挖掘了领导授权对员工创造力的中介机制与边界条件,并从领导授权、增强团队心理安全感知、做好员工情绪管理方面为企业的创新管理提供借鉴和参考。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王永伟
	韩雪亮
	田启涛

关键词：领导授权团队心理安全感知员工创造力积极情绪社会交换理论

Abstract： Based on the social exchange theory, this paper constructs a mechanism for the influence and transmission of leadership empowerment on employee creativity, using team psychological security perceptions as the mediating mechanism and positive emotions as the regulating mechanism. The research hypothesis is also validated through 243 data collected from two stages. There are following findings: (1) Leadership empowerment positively affects team psychological security perception and employee creativity; (2) Leadership empowerment indirectly affects employees’ creativity through team psychological security perception; (3)The positive emotions of employees can regulate the relationship between team psychological security perceptions and employee creativity. That is, when employees have high positive emotions, team psychological security perceptions have a stronger positive impact on employee creativity; (4) Employees’ positive emotions regulate the indirect effect of leadership empowerment on employee creativity through the team psychological security perception. That is, when employees have a high level of positive emotions, the positive effect of leadership empowerment on employee creativity through team psychological security perceptions is enhanced. The above conclusions of the study deeply excavates the intermediary mechanism and boundary conditions of leadership empowerment on employees’ creativity. It provides reference and reference for guiding the innovation management of enterprises from the aspects of leadership authorization, enhancing the perception of team psychological security and doing a good job of employee emotional management.

Keywords： Leader Empowerment Team Psychological Security Employee Creativity Positive Emotion Social Exchange Theory

收稿日期 2022-06-18; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家自然科学基金地区项目(72162032);教育部人文社科规划基金项目(22YJA630094);2019年度校级国家重点项目培育项目;2021年度河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划(人文社科类)(2021-CX-041);河南省哲学社会科学项目(2021BJJ008)

作者简介: 王永伟(1981— ),男,河南商水人,博士,副教授,主要从事领导行为与组织惯例研究;韩雪亮(1986— ),男,河南内黄人,博士,讲师,主要从事家族企业、组织战略与行为研究;田启涛(1981— ),男,河南商丘人,博士,副教授,主要从事组织行为、服务营销和营销沟通研究。

引用本文:

王永伟, 韩雪亮, 田启涛.领导授权如何激发员工创造力——基于积极情绪的调节作用[J]. 经济经纬, 2023,2: 121-129

WANG Yongwei, HAN Xueliang, TIAN Qitao.How Does Leadership Empowerment Stimulate Employee Creativity: Regulation Based on Positive Emotion[J] Economic Survey, 2023,V40(2): 121-129

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V40/I2/121

芭芭拉·弗雷,德·里克森帝,2012.积极情绪的力量[M].王珺,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
曹科岩,2015.团队心理安全感对成员创新行为影响的跨层次研究:知识分享的中介作用[J].心理科学(4):966-972.
陈国权, 陈子栋,2017.领导授权行为对员工学习能力影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理(3):114-127.
龚文,薛姣,2020.赋能型领导对员工创造力的影响:个人学习与成就动机的作用[J].技术经济(2):21-29.
郭小艳,王振宏,2007.积极情绪的概念、功能与意义[J].心理科学进展(5):810-815.
刘培琪,刘兵,李嫄,2018.授权型领导对知识型员工知识分享意愿的影响:基于社会信息加工的视角[J].技术经济 (7):81-87,98.
卿涛,凌玲,闫燕,2012.团队领导行为与团队心理安全:以信任为中介变量的研究[J].心理科学(1):208-212.
孙圣兰,吕洁,2016.授权型领导对员工创造力的影响:基于整合视角的分析[J].研究与发展管理 (4):117-125.
苏伟琳,林新奇,2019.上级发展性反馈对员工建言行为影响的双路径分析:基于社会交换理论与社会认知理论的视角[J].经济经纬(5):112-119.
汤超颖,艾树,龚增良,2011.积极情绪的社会功能及其对团队创造力的影响:隐性知识共享的中介作用[J].南开管理评论(4):129-137.
田红彬,田启涛,2019.服务型领导对员工职业使命感的影响机制研究[J].经济经纬(4):126-132.
王小予,席猛,赵曙明,2022.CEO真实型领导对员工组织依恋的影响:人力资本独特性的调节作用[J].中国人力资源开发(4):28-44.
韦慧民,龙立荣,2011.认知与情感信任、权力距离感和制度控制对领导授权行为的影响研究[J].管理工程学报 (1):10-17.
吴金南,王楠楠,刘林,等,2016.技术入侵生活对员工创新行为的影响:以工作满意和工作焦虑为中介变量[J].中国管理科学(S1):860-867.
王永伟,刘雨展,王嘉豪,等,2022.“明哲保身”对员工创造力的影响:基于员工授权与工作投入的视角[J].创新科技(4):81-92.
王永伟,马洁,吴湘繁,等,2012.变革型领导行为、组织学习倾向与组织惯例更新的关系研究[J].管理世界(9):110-119.
王永伟,岳彩军,杜浩阳,2021.组织惯例更新对组织绩效的影响研究[J].经济经纬(3):105-113.
魏华飞,古继宝,张淑林,2020.授权型领导影响知识型员工创新的信任机制[J].科研管理(4):103-111.
许慧, 2015.积极情绪对工程学生创新能力影响研究[J].高等工程教育研究(2):94-99.
袁博,孙向超,游冉,等,2018.情绪对信任的影响:来自元分析的证据[J].心理与行为研究(5):632-643.
杨勇,刘子琪,曹井柱, 2020.心理弹性、工作重塑对创造力和创意实施行为的作用机制:基于服务业情境研究[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版) (3):29-37.
朱永跃,欧阳晨慧,2019.领导授权与员工创造力:建言行为和权力距离的影响[J].工业工程与管理(2):116-122.
AHEARNE M, MATHIEU J, RAPP A,2005. To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 90(5):945-955.
BACKES-GELLNER U, VEEN S,2013. Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies-large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity[J]. Human resource management journal, 23(3): 279-295.
CROPAMZANO R,ANTHONY E L,DANIELS S R,et al.2017.Exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies[J].Academy of management annals,11(1): 1-38.
CHUGHTAI A, BYRNE M, FLOOD B, 2015. Linking ethical leadership to employee well-being: the role of trust in supervisor[J]. Journal of business ethics,128 (3):653-663.
CHAU P, KAL L H,1998. Identifying early adopters of new IT products: a case of windows 95[J]. Information & management, 33(5):225-230.
EISNBERGER R, ARMELI S, REXWINKEL B, et al,2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 86 (1):42-51.
EDMONDSON A,1999.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2):350-383.
GROSS J J,1998. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(1):224-237.
ISEN A N, DAUBMAN K A, NOWICKI G P,1987.Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6):1122-1131.
KARK R, CARMELI A,2009.Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 30(6): 785-804.
LEE J, WEI F,2011.The mediating effect of psychological empowerment on the relationship between participative goal setting and team outcomes-a study in China[J]. International journal of human resource management, 22(2):279-295.
LIU X ZHU Z, LIU Z, et al, 2020. The influence of leader empowerment behaviour on employee creativity[J]. Management decision, 58 (12):2681-2703.
RUSSELL JAMES A,1980. A circumplex model of affect[J]. Journal of personality & social psychology, 39(6):1161-1178.
SHALLEY C E, ZHOU J, OLDHAM G R,2004.The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here[J]. Journal of management, 30 (6):933-958.
SHORE L M, TETRICK L E, LYNCH P, et al,2006.Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation[J]. Journal of applied social psychology, 36(4):837-867.
WATSON D, CLARK L A, TELLEGEN A,1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 (6):1063-1070.
WAYNE S J, FERRIS G R, 1990. Influence tactics, affect and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 75 (5):487-499.
WAYNE S J, LIDEN R C,1995. Effects of impression management on performance ratings: a longitudinal study[J].Academy of management journal, 38(1): 232-260.
ZHANG X, ZHOU J,2014. Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust and employee creativity: interaction effects and a mediating mechanism[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes,124 (2): 150-164.
ZHOU J, GEORGE J M, 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice[J]. Academy of management journal, 44(4):682-696.