供应链企业间认知距离与社会距离对合作创新绩效的影响机制研究

摘要在供应链企业间合作创新项目中,隐性的认知距离和社会距离作为影响合作创新绩效的关键因素日益受到研究者们的重视。以城市轨道交通产业供应链的数据为基础,实证研究了供应链企业间的认知距离和社会距离对合作创新绩效的影响及其影响机制。研究发现:供应链企业间的认知距离、社会距离对新产品创新性具有正向影响,而对新产品开发速度具有负向影响;新产品创新性对合作创新绩效具有正向影响,而新产品开发速度对合作创新绩效具有负向影响;新产品创新性和新产品开发速度在供应链企业间认知距离、社会距离影响合作创新绩效的过程中具有中介作用。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胡琴芳
	李想
	唐未兵

关键词：认知距离社会距离新产品创新性新产品开发速度合作创新绩效

Abstract： In the collaborative innovation projects among supply chain enterprises, implicit cognitive distance and social distance are increasingly valued by researchers as key variables affecting cooperative innovation performance. Based on the data of the rail transit industry supply chain, the paper empirically studies the impact of cognitive distance and social distance on the performance of cooperative innovation and their influence mechanisms. The study finds that the cognitive distance and social distance between supply chain enterprises have a positive impact on the new product novelty, but have a negative one on the new product development speed. New product novelty has a positive impact on the cooperative innovation performance while new product development speed has a negative impact on it. New product novelty and new product development speed have a mediating role in the influencing process of cognitive distance and social distance between supply chain enterprises affecting cooperative innovation performance.

Keywords： Cognitive Distance Social Distance New Product Novelty New Product Development Speed Cooperative Innovation Performance

收稿日期 2018-11-18; 接受日期 ;

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71702053;71762006);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(18YJA630001);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(17YBA126);湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目(XSP19YBC257);湖南工业大学专项资金项目(2017ZBLZ01)。

作者简介: 胡琴芳(1982— ),女,湖南邵阳人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事供应链关系治理研究;李想(1995— ),男,江苏宿迁人,硕士,主要从事供应链管理研究;唐未兵(1962— ),男,湖南平江人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事宏观经济理论与政策、中国经济改革与发展研究。

引用本文:

胡琴芳, 李想, 唐未兵.供应链企业间认知距离与社会距离对合作创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2019,3: 110-117

HU Qin-fang, LI Xiang, TANG Wei-bing.Research on the Influence Mechanism of Cognitive Distance and Social Distance Between Supply Chain Enterprises on Cooperative Innovation Performance[J] Economic Survey, 2019,V36(3): 110-117

链接本文:

http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jjjw.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V36/I3/110

高维和,刘勇,陈信康等.2010.协同沟通与企业绩效:承诺的中介作用与治理机制的调节作用[J].管理世界(11): 76-93.
郭兵,罗守贵,宋燕飞.2015.所有制性质对新兴产业技术创新效率的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版)(12):1923-1928.
胡琴芳,张广玲,江诗松.2016.基于连带责任的供应商集群内机会主义行为治理研究——一种网络治理模式[J].南开管理评论(1):97-107.
王明海,李小静.2017.政府干预、外部投资对企业自主创新绩效的作用机理[J].江西社会科学(4):66-76.
王永贵,姚山季,司方来等.2011.组织顾客创新、供应商反应性与项目绩效的关系研究:基于组织服务市场的实证分析[J].南开管理评论(2):4-13
BOSCHMA R. 2005.Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74.
CASSI L, PLUNKET A. 2015.Research collaboration in co-inventor networks: Combining closure, bridging and proximities [J]. Regional Studies, 49(6): 936-954.
COHEN W M. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1):128-152.
CRAWFORD C M. 1992. The hidden costs of accelerated product development[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3): 188-199.
FANG E. 2008. Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market[J]. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 90-104.
GELDES C, FELZENSZTEIN C, TURKINA E. 2015. How does proximity affect interfirm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster[J]. Journal of Business Research, 68(2):263-272.
GHASSIM B. 2018. Sustainability-oriented innovation in the minerals industry: An empirical study on the effect of non-geographical proximity dimensions[J]. Sustainability, 10(2):282.
HANSEN T. 2014. Juggling with proximity and distance: Collaborative innovation projects in the Danish cleantech industry[J]. Economic Geography, 90(4): 375-402.
LUKAS B A, MENON A. 2004. New product quality: Intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed[J]. Journal of Business Research, 57(11): 1258-1264.
　　NOOTEBOOM B, VAN HAVERBEKE W, DUYSTERS G. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy, 36(7): 1016-1034.
PEREZ C, SOETE L. 1988. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity [M]. London: Francis Pinter.
PREACHER K J, HAYES A F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models[J]. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4): 717-731.
PUCCI T, BRUMANA M, MINOLA T. 2017. Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: The role of proximity and family involvement[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, (3): 1-23.
RINDFLEISCH A, MOORMAN C. 2001. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective[J]. Journal of Marketing, 65(2): 1-18.
　　SOONHEE K, HYANGSOO L. 2006. The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities[J]. Public Administration Review, 66(3) :370-385.
　　TIWANA A. 2008. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 29:251-272.