Abstract:
Effectively reducing overcapacity is one of the main contents of China’s current economic work. State-owned enterprises in overcapacity industries are also facing the key tasks of deepening the reform of mixed ownership. However, regarding the development of state-owned enterprises in the context of de-capacity, the specific impact of the social welfare effect is lacking in literature research. Based on the theory of mixed oligopoly, this paper constructs a theoretical model of the effects of mixed ownership reform represented by the privatization of state-owned enterprises on the output and social welfare effects of different types of enterprises under the background of excess capacity regulation. The panel data of six industries with overcapacity characteristics from 2008 to 2016 were selected for empirical analysis. The results show that the improvement of the degree of privatization of state-owned enterprises makes the output level of state-owned enterprises lower, while the output level of private enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises increase, and the level of social welfare a downward trend. The increase of industrial subsidies makes the level of social welfare increase first and then decrease. The downward trend of “U-shaped”; the increase of production restriction policy has a “U-shaped” trend of decreasing the social welfare effect of the industry with lower privatization level, and the social welfare effect of the medium-sized privatization industry is decreasing. Based on the conclusions, this paper proposes policy recommendations that related governments should further promote the reform of state-owned enterprises in a fully competitive industry, transfer subsidy policies to research and development link, use capital to guide output control, and build a mutually beneficial and open foreign market.
WANG Shaoguo, DENG Yang.A Research on the Impact of Privatization of State-owned Enterprises on Social Welfare Effect in Overcapacity Industry[J] Economic Survey, 2020,V37(3): 92-99
白让让.2016.供给侧结构性改革下国有中小企业退出与“去产能”问题研究[J].经济学动态(7):65-74. 洪银兴.2016.准确认识供给侧结构性改革的目标和任务[J].中国工业经济(6):14-21. 黄群慧.2016.论中国工业的供给侧结构性改革[J].中国工业经济(9):5-23. 贾康,苏京春.2016.论供给侧改革[J].管理世界(3):1-24. 李长英,付红艳.2008.混合寡头竞争条件下的购买势力研究[J].中国管理科学(6):156-163. 李志俊,原鹏飞.2018.产业供给侧结构性改革的影响及效果研究:基于产业结构变动的视角[J].经济经纬(2):86-92. 林毅夫.2016.供给侧改革的短期冲击与问题研究[J].河南社会科学(1):1-4. 刘霞辉.2016.供给侧结构性改革助推中国经济增长:2015年宏观经济分析及思考[J].学术月刊(4):54-62. 平新乔.2000.论国有经济比重的内生决定[J].经济研究(7):16-23,80. 徐晓慧,李杰.2016.混合寡头市场下的民营化和战略政策[J].中国经济问题(6):96-108. 叶光亮,邓国营.2010.最优关税和部分私有化战略:产品差异的混合寡头模型[J].经济学(季刊)(2):597-608. DE FRAJA G, DCLBONO F.1989.Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly[J].Oxford Economic Papers,41(2):302-311. FULTON M,GIANNAKAS K.2004. Inserting GM products into the food chain: The market and welfare effects of different labeling and regulatory regimes[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,86(1):42-60. MATSUMURA T.1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly[J]. Journal of Public Economics,70(3):473-483. PAL R,SAHA B.2015.Pollution tax,partial privatization and environment[J]. Resource and Energy Economics 40:19-35.